Staredit Network > Forums > SC2 Custom Maps > Topic: Having levelable units a good idea?
Having levelable units a good idea?
Mar 27 2012, 1:29 am
By: PunWisp  

Mar 27 2012, 1:29 am PunWisp Post #1



A thought I had, which after messing around with and properly setting up-works, I had this idea about bringing the leveling system to normal units, but not in the sense of making them heroes. Just normal units that gain experience in a battle, and if succeed or survive, gain from it. Having increased damage, hp, etc. So for example, if you have a single Archon thats kicking some zerg arse, it gets rewarded for all the kills and surviving it, having increased damage, shields, and hp.

Granted this idea could be OP, because if a powerful army killed another, and still lives in its fullest, then it just became that much more powerful.

Thoughts?

P.S I was thinking of adding this also to defenses, such as photon cannons, bunkers, etc. (units inside the bunker would level).



None.

Mar 27 2012, 1:46 am Ahli Post #2

I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.

It really depends on the map's combat system how this will turn out.

If you throw this system into a default melee game, you will buff protoss because their units tend to live longer than for example Zerg units.
But it will encourage stronger, beefy units like carriers and battle cruisers because they can benefit the most with these systems as the bonus is concentrated into one unit and kept alive until the whole unit dies instead of having the bonus split on multiple marines that crumble during the fight.

In general, it shouldn't have a to big impact in a melee game except if you design all combat dynamics around that system.
It will benefit players that keep their units alive.

But sadly that's hardest for Zerg players as most of their units die like flies during combat while other races tend to keep their units alive more easily.
So this bonus shouldn't be inceased on a kill basis, it should use an xp amount, so units need to kill multiple Zerglings to become stronger. Else Zerg becomes much weaker than the other races.

In some situations these changes can have a big impact, too.
For example in PvZ, a Zealot that kills a Zergling early game might start to 2 hit zerglings after leveling. Basically this would make the Zealot stronger by 33% versus Zerglings.




Mar 27 2012, 2:28 am PunWisp Post #3



I was thinking of applying it to melee games.

As for protoss I would agree. Since Protoss is stronger, could make it so protoss units that are killed give more xp from another race equivelent. So something like..

EXP GAIN

Zerglings = 1xp
Marines = 2xp
Zealots = 3xp

I think a better idea for these is to not give the leveling system to cannon fodder units. So marines/marauders, lings/roaches, zealots/stalkers. Instead give them to higher tiered units, such as siege tanks/battleships/thors/ghosts, Hydralisks/Ultras/Broods/corruptors, Archons/Collossus/Carriers/mothership. Something like that for the units who actually level. The cannon fodder units it may not be worth giving it to them, just because they are that, cheap cannon fodder, they wouldn't be hard to kill unless mass, and massing them may make this idea OP.

Or if all units have leveling abilities, just require a lot of xp to level. Higher the tier unit, the more xp.

Of course this can drastically change gameplay, and could create different styles of playing. Such as a small group of ghosts sniping out units to gain xp/levels. Or a collossus becoming considerably more powerful.

However you can change what units have what attributes, so you can have it so some units only become harder to kill. Such as a ultra gaining more armor & health, siege gaining more HP, with slight splash dmg increase. Collossus with just more damage. Not all units need to have the same stat gains.



None.

Mar 31 2012, 9:11 pm Jack Post #4

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

That reminds me of Command and Conquer's veterancy system. I quite enjoyed that, although I don't think it would mesh well with SC2 proleague it'd be fun in more casual games and campaigns.



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Apr 1 2012, 1:13 am PunWisp Post #5



Oh I remember that. Fun times :D

I already made it into a mod and played it with some friends, they liked it.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[03:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- (and yes, I capitalized that correctly :ego:)
[03:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Hi not I'm dad
Hi dad, I'm nude
[02:17 pm]
Zoan -- I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
[06:24 am]
Oh_Man -- uh I mean, pfft no i'm not a robot
[06:24 am]
Oh_Man -- 01001001 00100000 01100001 01101101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 00001010
[05:02 am]
NimoStar -- vtubers already behave as AIs so nobody would notice the difference
[03:42 am]
Symmetry -- If AI beat portal, then we can do an AI Vtuber
[03:24 am]
NimoStar -- Coming generations? Too much optimism I see
[03:05 am]
Symmetry -- The coming generations will have so much data online that their kids will never have to say goodbye (for a monthly fee)
[02:59 am]
Symmetry -- I mean it's not out of the question I suppose. An LLM could digitally replace people when they die. Imagine dead grandma messaging you to buy crypto
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Obsdark, NudeRaider