Prolly some minerals hand out for the best attempt, and tiny handouts for other good tries.
Thanks in advance.
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Hello
So, someone wants to make an awesome banner for affiliates? maybe the same size of the ones used at http://www.nibbits.com/sc2/
Prolly some minerals hand out for the best attempt, and tiny handouts for other good tries.
Thanks in advance.
Prolly some minerals hand out for the best attempt, and tiny handouts for other good tries.
Thanks in advance.
Same size as what?
I can't find a banner on that page that wasn't an advertisement.
I can't find a banner on that page that wasn't an advertisement.
None.
Hello
bottom right cornor, e.g that bylur image.
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Quote from 
Devourer
Devourerbottom right cornor, e.g that bylur image.
Ah, those. 88 x 31? Is that the standard size used by all affiliate sites?
None.
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Howzabout this: 
Resize it as needed, it'll look bad big but small should be fine.
Resize it as needed, it'll look bad big but small should be fine.
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
Hello
Pretty awesum, thouough, a lil too bright, no? make more SEN green in it, other than that I really likez it.
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Quote from Devourer
DevourerPretty awesum, thouough, a lil too bright, no? make more SEN green in it, other than that I really likez it.
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
I'm sure some1 can do better.
None.
Hello
Not really good, lotus :S
thanks for the try, though
thanks for the try, though
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Quote from 
Jack
JackHowzabout this:
Resize it as needed, it'll look bad big but small should be fine.
Resize it as needed, it'll look bad big but small should be fine.
How does that look resized down?
None.
None.
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Quote from Aristocrat
AristocratQuote from Jack
JackHowzabout this: 
Resize it as needed, it'll look bad big but small should be fine.
Resize it as needed, it'll look bad big but small should be fine.
How does that look resized down?
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
Hello
Not that bad, what does the "rest" of you think?
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
My quick try:
No one told me where the logo SVG file was so I had to make it from scratch, so some edges might not be perfectly straight.
No one told me where the logo SVG file was so I had to make it from scratch, so some edges might not be perfectly straight.
None.
88x31. Simplistic in its design: nondistracting and recognizable, but it wouldn't be very interesting at a large size. It's a simple design, though; if someone wants to upscale it, they could recreate it from scratch with relative ease. Come to think of it, the logotype should be nudged 1px to the left. I have the original XCF so I can do this if anyone actually likes this one.
None.
Nice idea, mind if I steal it? >_>
EDIT> Try this?
EDIT2> Less bright border.
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Aug 6 2010, 11:58 pm by Aristocrat.
EDIT> Try this?
EDIT2> Less bright border.
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Aug 6 2010, 11:58 pm by Aristocrat.
None.
Woah
I prefer David's to Aristo's because it's crisper.
Currently Working On:
Myself
Currently Working On: Myself
Size kills me. You can't see the font correctly. Lame.
I like cobbs but the bottom left part looks weird. besides that he gets mah vote.
None.
Quote from DavidJCobb
DavidJCobb88x31. Simplistic in its design: nondistracting and recognizable, but it wouldn't be very interesting at a large size. It's a simple design, though; if someone wants to upscale it, they could recreate it from scratch with relative ease. Come to think of it, the logotype should be nudged 1px to the left. I have the original XCF so I can do this if anyone actually likes this one.
I like this, i can actually read the Staredit network.
None.
My "t" didn't have the horizontal bar. Lol. oops.
Fixed:
Fixed:
None.
[2026-3-09. : 2:49 am]
Ultraviolet -- "Not many people know this, but I actually got the idea for my mustache after seeing the end of a paintbrush for the first time." 
[2026-3-08. : 12:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- "often was always pretty cool" 60% of the time, it works every time 
[2026-3-07. : 11:26 pm]
NudeRaider -- The visuals are good, the animation is terrible: the movement is off, the impacts in battle scenes have zero weight to it, the lip sync is right up uncanny valley. But yeah, considering what it is it's pretty good overall.[2026-3-07. : 9:51 am]
NimoStar -- And Pathfinding in SC1 was not *that* bad, the problem is that it was designed as a flat 2D game like WC1 (and it was in the alpha) and then switched to isometric without changing the base code. So its actually a flat game pretending to be isometric. With the custom competitive maps that use larger ramps and elevation, pathfinding is quite fixed.[2026-3-07. : 9:47 am]
NimoStar -- The unlocking and map choice was fine, but mostly in WoL - In HoTS the worst of all units are irrelevant because Kerrigan has infinite summon and stuff. And even in WoL the spaceship instakill map powers are better than units. If I could RTS in my RTS that'd be great.[2026-3-05. : 8:45 pm]
NudeRaider -- NekronNekron shouted: NudeRaider not that the og sc1 campaigns are particularly good mechanically but cmon, SC2 map mechanics are the opposite of fun
There's many parts to it. I think the raw rts gameplay of sc1 is unsurpassed to this day. And I too never liked that sc2 missions always rush you in some way or another, because I like to take my time. However I still have to admit that they way they did it often was always pretty cool. Like lava rising and receding, a huge-ass mothership destroying bases, undead coming at night, just to name a few, those are definitely creative, so I'm sure there's people that liked it. But that's not even what I meant. It's the unlocking of new features and upgrades and choice which map to play next that made it so much more motivating for me.[2026-3-05. : 6:49 pm]
Nekron -- like the train maps, enemies just kind of come at you (I'm not sure if there is a real enemy base, there might be one just on a technicality - you are to never interact with its production) and then you gotta chase trains for lulz
Members Online: RIVE
RIVE