None.
64 isn't enough
64 actions per trigger isn't enough for my bound, is there any way to get more or an easier way to make bounds?
Most bounds use multiple triggers per obstacle. Just continue the set of actions from one trigger to another by setting a switch.
eg:
action.
action.
action.
set switch 1.
preserve trigger.
conditions:
switch 1 is set.
actions:
action.
etc...
eg:
action.
action.
action.
set switch 1.
preserve trigger.
conditions:
switch 1 is set.
actions:
action.
etc...
None.
Chuiu solved it, but here's a more detailed tutorial if you need it:
http://doodle77.dyndns.org/tutorials.php?id=187
http://doodle77.dyndns.org/tutorials.php?id=187
None.
I'm using the switches to activate the bounds. 
.
.None.
Then use Death Counts.
None.
, nvmhttp://waitbutwhy.com/2013/09/why-generation-y-yuppies-are-unhappy.html
"We're being taught to hate downwards"
"We're being taught to hate downwards"
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Quote from blacklight28
I'm using the switches to activate the bounds. .
.Use a 2nd switch like this:
Switch "Bound1" is Set
Actions...
Set Switch "Bound1,2"
Clear Switch "Bound1"
Switch "Bound1,2" is Set
Actions...
Set Switch "Bound1"
Clear Switch "Bound1,2"
so what if your already using switches to start levels
somehow.. i don't think your gonna have anymore then 50ish levels ¬_¬ still leaves like 200 switches
somehow.. i don't think your gonna have anymore then 50ish levels ¬_¬ still leaves like 200 switches
None.
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
then use death counts as switches to link the 2 triggers to run them after each other....
use 'set deaths of [any unit which cannot die in your map for that player] for current player to 1', instead of 'set switch 1'
and use the fitting condition (current player has exactly 1 death of [that unit you chosed]).
use 'set deaths of [any unit which cannot die in your map for that player] for current player to 1', instead of 'set switch 1'
and use the fitting condition (current player has exactly 1 death of [that unit you chosed]).
What I used to do a long time ago is use minerals. Just use "x" minerals as a condition along with your switches. On the next trigger set it to "x+1" etc. It's not really an efficient way, but it looks like your having trouble understanding the other strategies, and this is a good simple way to do it.
None.
Maybe someone should let Blizzard know our demands for StarCraft II. The new technology and whatnot we should have a mass capacity of at least 100 triggers per second active. Does anybody really use the max trigger amount? I've never even come close I enjoy making campaign maps like Panzer Kavalier (wherever he is). I can't even image the tedious time it must take to use up all those trigger formations.
None.
Conditions:
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit].
Other required Conditions
Actions:
Actions 1-64
Conditions:
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit]
Other Required Conditions
Actions:
65-128
When the players beat a level simply add 1 to the death counter and do the next level triggers, and make sure you order these triggers one after another, since starcraft does in fact read triggers in order from top to bottom.
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit].
Other required Conditions
Actions:
Actions 1-64
Conditions:
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit]
Other Required Conditions
Actions:
65-128
When the players beat a level simply add 1 to the death counter and do the next level triggers, and make sure you order these triggers one after another, since starcraft does in fact read triggers in order from top to bottom.
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Quote from Vrael
Conditions:
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit].
Other required Conditions
Actions:
Actions 1-64
Conditions:
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit]
Other Required Conditions
Actions:
65-128
When the players beat a level simply add 1 to the death counter and do the next level triggers, and make sure you order these triggers one after another, since starcraft does in fact read triggers in order from top to bottom.
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit].
Other required Conditions
Actions:
Actions 1-64
Conditions:
Current Player has suffered exactly 1 deaths of [unit]
Other Required Conditions
Actions:
65-128
When the players beat a level simply add 1 to the death counter and do the next level triggers, and make sure you order these triggers one after another, since starcraft does in fact read triggers in order from top to bottom.
But since usually every bound uses waits for the timing your suggestion doesn't apply here.
An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death
Quote from GuN_Solar90
Maybe someone should let Blizzard know our demands for StarCraft II. The new technology and whatnot we should have a mass capacity of at least 100 triggers per second active. Does anybody really use the max trigger amount? I've never even come close I enjoy making campaign maps like Panzer Kavalier (wherever he is). I can't even image the tedious time it must take to use up all those trigger formations.
Learn how EUDs work: A Mapmaker's Guide for Creating EUDs
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
I figured out the switch method by myself without tutorials or help.
Man I'm smart
Man I'm smart
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-6-26. : 10:31 am]
NudeRaider -- blessed innocent soul knows nothing of the strife we had before EUDs were discovered 
[2026-6-23. : 3:29 am]
DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.
[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings[2026-6-20. : 6:15 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.
Members Online: Zycorax
Zycorax