Staredit Network > Profile-Scene > bernardetanner > basic
Profile for bernardetanner
Options
Send me a Message
Find my Posts
Find my Topics
Send me Minerals

Last visitors
biwatch

Account Information
Joined: Dec 15 2021, 8:36 am
Last Active: Dec 15 2021, 8:37 am
Status: Offline
Display Name: bernardetanner

Statistics
Activity: 2
Posts: 0
Posts Per Day: 1
Topics: 0
Minerals: -150

Contact Information
E-Mail: Lewl coming soon // No spambots

Battle.net
Starcraft I: Not Given.
Starcraft II: Not Given.


Signature
The current information landscape is overflowing with a multitude of news, and "news-like" sources. The sheer quantity of these sources presents a unique challenge to each one of us, who are news literate ourselves.

One of the most common complaints from individuals who read news is "I do not know who to believe anymore." However no one of us has the luxury of simply abandoning the search, rather we must take the initiative to find out what we can believe, no matter how difficult that may be. Look at here to find out a useful source on news paper.

Although there are many factors that can be utilized to assess the credibility or bias of news media, we found that there are essential factors which can be applied to almost every article. By making assessments about these important factors it is possible to be able to make an informed decision about accuracy and validity. When you can reasonably determine the reliability and bias of a piece of content it is possible to infer a level of confidence.

Reliability
To first assess the reliability of news content be sure to consider the following elements independently:

Expression
Veracity
Headline/Graphic

Expression
The way an article is written can give valuable clues about its authenticity, even before you attempt to verify the truthfulness of individual facts. You must consider whether the article is primarily factual statements, analysis statements or highly opinionated assertions.

The majority of these articles contain opinion statements and very opinionated claims are less reliable than those that are primarily facts and analysis statements. However, those that include more information and analysis are more trustworthy. It is recommended to verify to make sure.

Veracity
It's not possible for individual to verify and verify every claim in every article, however it is important to try to determine the veracity of certain key facts. In particular, if any statements in an article are unexpected, suspicious or infuriating to you, or sound like they'd be "big, if they were true," it's time to begin looking for the truth.

Headline and Graphic
The ability to compare a headline or graphic to its corresponding story is a simple, but powerful aspect to take into account when assessing overall reliability. Sometimes headlines and graphics give a different impression of the story than what it actually states after having read it.

If you are able to determine that the headline of an article's article and corresponding graphic do not correspond to the information contained in the article itself, you should be able to conclude that the entire article is less trustworthy as compared to one in which both are in line with each other.

Bias
Evaluating degrees of bias is also important in today's news landscape, because there is huge differences between opinion and analysis that merely advocates or argues for different views as opposed to extremist, polarizing, and inflammatory content that criticizes and discredits those who oppose one's political views.

Language
Examining different types of indicators for linguistics could reveal clues to the bias of the article. A first kind of linguistic indicator is the words used to describe the political views. It is crucial to note if an article uses words which are typically used to describe one side like "prolife" in contrast to "prochoice" or "illegal immigrants against. undocumented immigrants."

Each side has milder and more extreme terminology for political debates. These terms are helpful clues however they require that the reader be aware of which side uses which terms.

Comparison
Often, the best way to determine the quality of an article can be assessed in relation with other articles that cover the same subject. It is possible to compare the content with others by reading it later in other news outlets. This will let you know the subject matter it is focusing on and what is left out.
[01:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: yes, all animations for protoss and zerg should be there, unless I missed any
daymn, impressive
[12:03 pm]
NudeRaider -- define "completely fucked" - could also be a good thing :teach:
[04:23 am]
NimoStar -- yes, all animations for protoss and zerg should be there, unless I missed any
[12:43 am]
Moose -- Dem0n
Dem0n shouted: Moose, you ever go to sleep knowing that you're completely fucked for the next day? I do it every night.
tbh
[2026-8-13. : 4:20 pm]
Oh_Man -- did you give all animations for researching/recruiting buildings for protoss and zerg?
[2026-8-13. : 1:52 pm]
NimoStar -- prerelease of improves 1.16.1
[2026-8-13. : 1:51 pm]
NimoStar -- www.moddb.com/mods/ultimate-starcraft-age-of-darkness/downloads/ultimate-starcraft-age-of-darkness-secret-beta-release
[2026-8-13. : 3:03 am]
Symmetry -- Roy the way the screen moves hurts my eyes but otherwise it plays remarkably well
[2026-8-12. : 5:23 pm]
Roy -- Moose
Moose shouted: Just made? I thought we had that years ago
"We have Super Mario at home."
[2026-8-11. : 4:44 am]
Zycorax -- :wob:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Nekron