Staredit Network

Staredit Network > Profile-Scene > epp_2k > basic

Profile for epp_2k

Basic

Contributions

Activity-Logs

Administration

Send me a Message
Find my Posts
Find my Topics
Send me Minerals

None.

Account Information
Joined:	Aug 13 2021, 2:10 am
Last Active:	Aug 19 2021, 5:39 am
Status:	Offline
Display Name:	epp_2k

Statistics
Activity:	8
Posts:	1
Posts Per Day:	0
Topics:	0
Minerals:	-147

Contact Information
E-Mail:	Lewl coming soon // No spambots

Battle.net
Starcraft I:	Not Given.
Starcraft II:	Not Given.

None.

Global Shoutbox

[02:29 am]

Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself

[01:46 am]

Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me

[06:02 pm]

Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"

[05:48 pm]

Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs

[05:47 pm]

Zoan -- Heinermann

Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased

Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative

[05:44 pm]

NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?

[05:43 pm]

Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased

[05:39 pm]

NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal

[05:32 pm]

Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought

[04:32 pm]

NudeRaider -- Zoan

Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive

you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

Heinermann,

Oh_Man