Staredit Network > Forums > Portal News > Topic: Updates 09.21.2008
Updates 09.21.2008
Sep 21 2008, 7:27 am
By: Moose  

Sep 21 2008, 7:27 am Moose Post #1

meme

Two small but notable bugfixes for the forums:

1. No more silly negative number SQL errors. (thanks Matt_Burch!)
2. No more scalar value used in array errors for polls.




Sep 21 2008, 2:17 pm l)ark_ssj9kevin Post #2

Just here for the activity... well not really

Thanks, now I can finally use the "Recent Post" link instead of going into the forum and THEN clicking the last page >__<



guy lifting weight (animated smiley):

O-IC
OI-C

"Oh, I see it"


Sep 21 2008, 2:46 pm FlyingHat Post #3



I love you very much Moose, may I cuddle you?



None.

Sep 21 2008, 3:56 pm poiuy_qwert Post #4

PyMS and ProTRG developer

The first problem doesn't give the error anymore, but its screwy. In a thread with one reply i clicked the "Recent Posts" thing and it only showed the last post and it wasn't on a page (pages list showed [<][1][>] and [1] was still clickable). I clicked the page 1 link and it showed both posts. Hard to explain, you probably don't get what I said, just try it yourself.




Sep 21 2008, 4:03 pm Moose Post #5

meme

Yeah, pages that normally would have died have lost proper page numbers.
In my mind, it's a lot better than not viewing the page.




Sep 21 2008, 9:48 pm Hug A Zergling Post #6



*Applause From Studio Audience*



None.

Sep 21 2008, 9:58 pm Demented Shaman Post #7



A great fix.



None.

Sep 22 2008, 4:24 am Matt Burch Post #8



Quote from Mini Moose 2707
1. No more silly negative number SQL errors. (thanks Matt_Burch!)
No problem. :)



None.

Sep 22 2008, 10:32 pm poiuy_qwert Post #9

PyMS and ProTRG developer

When trying to "View Recent Posts" on a thread with no replies, i get:
Code
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/starlite/public_html/scripts/forums/topic.php on line 413

and it shows no posts.




Sep 25 2008, 1:19 am Test Post #10



IP/Moose forgot to do if ($var) { foreach ($var as ...) { ... } }



None.

Sep 25 2008, 5:40 am A_of-s_t Post #11

aka idmontie

When I click on a topic I've never read, but has replies, the first post does not show up and the next post says it is post #-19.



Personal GitHub
Starcraft GitHub Organization - Feel free to request member status!
TwitchTV

Sep 29 2008, 11:02 pm Matt Burch Post #12



I guess making a note to moderators would be a good idea? So when they click a topic they haven't read, and it shows the second post first; They don't just delete it because it doesn't make any sense..?



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: l)ark_ssj9kevin