Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Post Count/minerals/activity counter
Post Count/minerals/activity counter
Aug 16 2008, 2:59 am
By: rockz  

Aug 16 2008, 2:59 am rockz Post #1

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

I suck with names. It helps me to see if they are a complete newb (post count <25) or a regular contributor. I actually think the karma (bugged as it was) was a good indicator. People with very low karma obviously just made an account, and those with high karma have been here a while. Most of these people I can recognize, but there are some, especially those who change their name or avatar, who I just forget.

Why do I find it helpful? Since I mostly post in UMS Assistance, a lot of that has to do with people asking simple questions, and it's useful to know how descriptive I can be, or whether or not I should dumb the post down a lot.

Pretty much, all I'm saying is, don't get rid of these things, since even minerals will do. Since you start with negative minerals, it's very easy to tell if someone is a newb (or a cheater) right off the bat. I realize we're going through modifications to the site, but I'd like something around these lines to be under the avatar, like most other forums.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Aug 16 2008, 5:49 am Moose Post #2

meme

Quote from rockz
It helps me to see if they are a complete newb (post count <25) or a regular contributor.
Post count was never displayed on every post.

Quote from rockz
I actually think the karma (bugged as it was) was a good indicator.
Karma still exists, and there were never any bugs with it.

Quote from rockz
I realize we're going through modifications to the site, but I'd like something around these lines to be under the avatar, like most other forums.
I agree. The numerical indicators were useful in sizing up others.



None.

Aug 16 2008, 5:50 am DT_Battlekruser Post #3



My reputation system! :P

We actually coded the days-active tracker.




None.

Aug 16 2008, 6:15 am Demented Shaman Post #4



This is a dumb idea. You should treat and view everyone the same.

I know I do because I see everyone as an inferior nub, but that's just me. :whistling1:



None.

Aug 16 2008, 12:53 pm Brontobyte Post #5



Quote from name:devilesk
This is a dumb idea. You should treat and view everyone the same.

I know I do because I see everyone as an inferior nub, but that's just me. :whistling1:

They should also code some sort of jerk alert, for people like devilesk, or maybe just devilesk, who think that they are better then others. Maybe something like other users can give you points based on your posting habits and take them away. I think you have it called the "reputation" system, but I just want it under the users avatar.



None.

Aug 16 2008, 1:29 pm Vi3t-X Post #6



Completely agree with rockz, COMPLETELY.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[03:29 am]
DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.
[2026-6-22. : 8:35 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2026-6-21. : 11:38 pm]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically
[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?
[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings
[2026-6-20. : 6:15 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.
[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.
[2026-6-20. : 3:43 pm]
NudeRaider -- Contained nothing new for me. Didn't know all building's behavior, but very much all unit's. Also Terran balance whine - also nothing new :lol:
[2026-6-19. : 9:57 am]
Oh_Man -- makes me wonder if SEN knows anything about the topic
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Vrael, NudeRaider