None.
Need some doodads?
Haha I know! I'm glad I'm not the only one that thinks there's something wrong with this guy
Quote from 
Jello-Jigglers
Jello-Jigglers@ LemonFang: Thanks! Even though those are probably the easiest blends they look pretty nice 
@ ATG: Rating? Likes? Dislikes?
@ ATG: Rating? Likes? Dislikes?
).None.
Way to revive dead topics that have not been seen since September of 2007. However, I never would have seen this topic without it, and although most of it wasn't new to me, there were a few temple doodads that I don't think I've seen before.
None.
Wtf, I thought this was a new topic 
Stop reviving people!
Stop reviving people!
None.
Random...
lol well I don't really know how to lock it or I would.
lol well I don't really know how to lock it or I would.
None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal [04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)