This goes for both attachments and [img] images.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 4 2007, 9:21 am by isolatedpurity.
None.
Images in posts
Polls
What would you like them to do?
What would you like them to do?
| Answer | Votes | Percentage | % | Voters |
| Open in a new window / tab | 15 | 19% |
None.
|
|
| Open in a js popup, fitted to image size | 5 | 7% |
None.
|
|
| Open in a js in-page popup (pretty much like blizzards show full image style on their sc2 page) | 9 | 12% |
None.
|
|
| Expand to full size on click | 34 | 44% |
None.
|
|
| Show full image to start with, no thumbnails for excessive size | 16 | 21% |
None.
|
Poll has 79 votes. You can vote for at most 2 option(s).
Opinions?
This goes for both attachments and [img] images.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 4 2007, 9:21 am by isolatedpurity.
This goes for both attachments and [img] images.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 4 2007, 9:21 am by isolatedpurity.
I like being able to expand to full size on click, but it should only be with a certain size, say.. above 800x600.
None.
Dungeon Master
Anything that doesn't stretch the page should be viewable normally. Everything else should be expand on click.
SC2 Page style would be ultra cool.. 
None.
Don't resize every image. Just those that overflow the post space.
None.
That's the plan... images bigger than like 500px in width or 250px in height...
None.
I like the click for expanded image, but only if the image is really big.
None.
Quote from Killer_Kow
Anything that doesn't stretch the page should be viewable normally. Everything else should be expand on click.
None.
Quote from Killer_Kow
Anything that doesn't stretch the page should be viewable normally. Everything else should be expand on click.
None.
show full from start! everything else sucks for terrain
None.
I enjoy NOT having to click Starcraft Screenshots to make them full screen.
None.
IP, make the maximum size a bit larger, I just want to be able to easily put the whole thing on my screen, any bigger is too big, but right now they can only be a tiny bit larger than the thumbnails to show up.
None.
I liked v4.1 - images with [IMG] don't scale, but attached images do.
None.
Quote from DT_Battlekruser
I liked v4.1 - images with [IMG] don't scale, but attached images do.
I'd say any images that are too big can be cropped... though scaling is a good option too.
None.
expand to full size
None.
Quote
Expand to full size on click
Quote
Open in a new window / tab
None.
I prefer expand to full size on click.
Also, what about having people be able to select a setting in their control panel Like be able to expand on click or open in new window on click.
Also, what about having people be able to select a setting in their control panel
Like be able to expand on click or open in new window on click.None.
I think attachment images should be thumbnail sized (make a separate image for the thumbnail, so total page size is smaller) and expand on click, and [img] images should only be scaled if they are above 640x480 (size of a SC screenshot)
If you need inspiration on how to implement this, look at SMF (http://nifflas.ni2.se/forum is a smf forum).
If you need inspiration on how to implement this, look at SMF (http://nifflas.ni2.se/forum is a smf forum).
None.
Seems like the majority wants full size/full size on click. So, if a image is like 2000x1500, you want it in still contained in the post area? That's my main concern. It would distort the page once you click it (or if it exists as is).
I couldn't find any attached images on that forum... and it was kinda hideous to look at so I didn't go too far
.
I couldn't find any attached images on that forum... and it was kinda hideous to look at so I didn't go too far
.None.
http://nifflas.ni2.se/forum/index.php?topic=842.0 is a topic with attached images.
The problem of huge images should be solved the same way as on Maplantis, overflow:auto;.
The problem of huge images should be solved the same way as on Maplantis, overflow:auto;.
None.
Options
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Members Online: jun3hong