Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Apology
Apology
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 26 2008, 11:40 pm
By: Praetor  

Mar 26 2008, 11:40 pm Praetor Post #1

layin' in the cut

I'm sorry for my previous actions and I would like to apologize to anybody who was offended or annoyed by what I said. I made the bad decision in haste, and I said some things I didn't mean. I know I have made a mistake, and I would like to make up for that in some way. It won't happen again, from any IP or account. However, I would like to request an unban. I am truly sorry for what happened.

-Praetor



this too shall pass

Mar 26 2008, 11:42 pm Syphon Post #2



You were IP banned for a reason. And by "Rash" you mean you've acted like a complete idiot for a year on impulse, and are only sorry once there are consequences?



None.

Mar 26 2008, 11:44 pm candle12345 Post #3



"a mistake"
A?
Meaning, singular?

You've been here like, 3 days, and all we've gotten from you is shit. Get lost.



None.

Mar 26 2008, 11:45 pm JamaL Post #4



It isn't impulse when he continually does it. It's called being an ass.

Still, don't flame him.



None.

Mar 26 2008, 11:46 pm Praetor Post #5

layin' in the cut

Quote from Syphon
you've acted like a complete idiot for a year on impulse,

???

Quote from Syphon
and are only sorry once there are consequences?

no, in hindsight i truly am apologetic.

Quote from JamaL
It isn't impulse when he continually does it. It's called being an ass.
continually? it was over the period of like 20 mins



this too shall pass

Mar 26 2008, 11:47 pm candle12345 Post #6



Quote from JamaL
It isn't impulse when he continually does it. It's called being an ass.

Still, don't flame him.

I'm not flaming, I haven't seen what he's done on maplantis, but I've seen enough here.
I don't want to see more of him. That's not a flame, that's an opinion.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 1:10 am Moose Post #7

Armor: 90.50%

Can't do the time? Don't do the crime.




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[02:26 am]
Apos -- :wob:
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Ultraviolet