Staredit Network > Forums > Games > Topic: CinoBound
CinoBound
Mar 10 2018, 3:04 am
By: Cinolt  

Mar 10 2018, 3:04 am Cinolt Post #1





https://cino.lt

Here is a browser game that I made that simulates StarCraft UMS bound maps. There are only 8 levels so far, but I may add more in the future.

You need a WebGL2-enabled browser to play it, so Internet Explorer users should hurry up and make the switch.



None.

Mar 10 2018, 3:04 pm DarkenedFantasies Post #2

Roy's Secret Service

Seems I don't have WebGL2 enabled at the moment, so I can't check it out yet.

There's quite a few standalone Bound projects popping up around. Maybe if the bounding community wasn't so adamantly leaving StarCraft behind to go their own way, it would still be alive on b.net. :teehee:

Something I find sad is that apparently no one seeks to simulate the latency delay; that was the main thing that made bounding what it was, methinks.




Mar 10 2018, 3:16 pm Cinolt Post #3



Try it on FireFox. WebGL2 is disabled on Chrome for some people.

It took some getting used to no input latency, but I'd rather not have any TBH.



None.

Mar 10 2018, 4:08 pm MTiger156 Post #4

Veteran Mapper

Quote
There's quite a few standalone Bound projects popping up around. Maybe if the bounding community wasn't so adamantly leaving StarCraft behind to go their own way, it would still be alive on b.net. :teehee:
I could fix that, once I wrap up a current project. Though I've only made one (pretty bad) bound in the past, I could do much better with my new skills.




Mar 11 2018, 2:17 am DarkenedFantasies Post #5

Roy's Secret Service

Well, there are already thousands of bound maps that have been created and floating around on map download sites. If people have no interest in playing any of those online, I don't think one new map will do anything about it. :rip:

Though on the other hand, any activity with bounding is welcome to me anyway. If you do make it, I'll play it when you publish it!




Apr 20 2024, 9:22 am Linekat Post #6



getting used to no input latency



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:53 am]
NimoStar -- ban the bot :))
[05:17 am]
Oh_Man -- Like it doesnt even bother to build a comsat unless it sees a lurker or dt, etc
[05:15 am]
Oh_Man -- Hope that makes sense. Also artosiscast just dropped a 1 hour vid he analayses a bunch of its games. The TLDR is the maphack is responsible for a large percentage of its wins because its just hard countering zerg rushes
[05:14 am]
Oh_Man -- It's EMULATING the behaviour of a control group select and move without having the actual functionality to do that
[05:13 am]
Oh_Man -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: yeah but it looks like pluto's eAPM is still 6000 based on issuing all those orders
k the APM is inflated because it issues 12 identical orders individually. Its not 12 unique orders
[03:02 am]
Vrael -- which does reduce down to the same tradeoff I mentioned below, aka trading APM for time, but still interesting
[03:01 am]
Vrael -- and while the reaver was reloading it used that time to aggregate enough marine/tank to fend it off
[03:01 am]
Vrael -- like its micro vs one of the in-base reaver drops was pretty insane, basically it made the reaver spend 1 scarab per unit instead of 1 scarab for many workers/units
[02:58 am]
Vrael -- all the stuff I've said below is based on the actual gameplay vs some strong human performers, seems like the bot just has unfair advantages, but its also doing some cool stuff
[02:57 am]
Vrael -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
I mean human brains trained the bot too, its not completely infeasible for the bot to actually be strong in certain scenarios
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: NimoStar, NudeRaider, Oh_Man