Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Multiple member clan requirement
Multiple member clan requirement
Feb 25 2008, 11:01 pm
By: Centreri  

Feb 25 2008, 11:01 pm Centreri Post #1

Relatively ancient and inactive

I just looked at the sheer amount of clans we have on SEN, picked three on random (including MP)) and they had one member. Shouldn't there be like a three-person requirement to register a clan on SEN?



None.

Feb 25 2008, 11:01 pm Moose Post #2

Armor: 90.50%

We know most of the clans are bullshit. We can only fix so many things at a time.




Feb 25 2008, 11:03 pm Centreri Post #3

Relatively ancient and inactive

Yay. There should be a thread for these small suggestions, because this feels like a waste of space now.



None.

Feb 26 2008, 2:09 am Matt Burch Post #4



I think it's actually good to have a separate topic per problem. It allows it to be noticed more by mods/admins than just one topic, and not having to reply with a huge post trying to fix everyone's problem at once makes everything less confusing. Also it has a better chance of the member's problem to not be forgotten about.



None.

Feb 26 2008, 2:34 am Forsaken Archer Post #5



Matt is generally right...



None.

Feb 26 2008, 3:29 am Demented Shaman Post #6



Quote from Mini Moose 2707
We know most of the clans are bullshit.
Except Clan Nucca.



None.

Feb 26 2008, 3:40 am Moose Post #7

Armor: 90.50%

Sorry, haven't heard of that one.




Feb 26 2008, 3:50 am Matt Burch Post #8



A mineral deduction for creating a clan will once and for all put an end to the bullshit clans.



None.

Feb 26 2008, 3:53 am Forsaken Archer Post #9



Initially that was the idea...



None.

Feb 26 2008, 3:53 am Moose Post #10

Armor: 90.50%

Oh yeah, I plan to implement a nice fat creation fee if I ever start caring more about clans. :P




Feb 26 2008, 4:33 am Forsaken Archer Post #11



Mineral fine for us deleting your dumb clan... gg...



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[02:26 am]
Apos -- :wob:
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: lucaspalm