Staredit Network > Forums > Games > Topic: Does anyone play Casual Games anymore?
Does anyone play Casual Games anymore?
Apr 3 2014, 4:26 am
By: DrZygote214  

Apr 3 2014, 4:26 am DrZygote214 Post #1



I'm curious just how popular or not casual games are to the average person. Like puzzle or arcade games, or many facebook games, things that don't have a lot of background/story/depth but are just a series of levels to beat/survive---maybe even riddle games?

An example would be this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlU1OcWDd8A
Looks like the perfect stereotypical casual game yet it only has 10 downloads. Are casual games dead?

As for me, I do play them, but it's kinda half and half between those things and more in-depth games (read: big name games like Starcraft or Play Station).



None.

Apr 3 2014, 10:17 am lil-Inferno Post #2

Just here for the pie

People still play casual games, but the standard has risen. Say all you want about games like Candy Crush, they're highly polished. The game in the video you linked has terrible production values; many larger companies have moved in on the casual market and increased the quality standard way beyond that. If anything, this has attracted more people to the casual gaming market than the "hardcore" gaming market, you just don't hear discussion about casual games because they aren't games that are made for discussion.




Apr 4 2014, 2:24 pm Riney Post #3

Thigh high affectionado

FILTHY CASUALS.

In all seriousness though. I might play a flash game or something that isn't as 'hardcore' as the usual games I play. This might include anywhere from Newgrounds or Armor Games' lineup, or very rarely Bejeweled on Facebox.

Who remembers Bejeweled? :awesome:



.riney on Discord.
Riney on Steam (Steam)
@RineyCat on Twitter

Sure I didn't pop off on SCBW like I wanted to, but I won VRChat. Map maker for life.

Apr 4 2014, 4:35 pm rayNimagi Post #4



Personally, I don't. But I think many people do, including some of the people I know.



Win by luck, lose by skill.

Apr 4 2014, 11:41 pm Fire_Kame Post #5

wth is starcraft

I'm on level 488 of candy crush saga. I love casual games honestly. :awesome: My favorite is Bubble Spinner.




Apr 5 2014, 5:22 am Aristocrat Post #6



I have less and less time to game as the years pass, and I simply cannot keep up in a competitive game with other players who have more free time and dedication than I do.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: l)ark_ssj9kevin