Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Self Esteem
Self Esteem
Jan 14 2013, 10:51 pm
By: Sacrieur  
Polls
What did you score?
What did you score?
Answer Votes Percentage % Voters
0-4 0
 
0%
None.
5-9 1
 
8%
10-14 2
 
15%
15-19 5
 
36%
20-24 3
 
22%
25-29 1
 
8%
30 2
 
15%
Please login to vote.
Poll has 14 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

Jan 14 2013, 10:51 pm Sacrieur Post #1

Still Napping

HOW MUCH YOU GOT?

Use this and then post your result.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 14 2013, 10:58 pm by Sacrieur.



None.

Jan 14 2013, 11:44 pm Azrael Post #2



You first, otherwise I'm too scared that my score won't be good enough.




Jan 14 2013, 11:57 pm Vrael Post #3



19. I feel this scale is very poor though. For example, on Q7 "On the whole, I am satisfied with myself." I clicked disagree, because there is so much more I aspire to be, and I think this reasoning is worth more than 1 point. Secondly, the test-takers aren't informed what "strongly agree" vs. "agree" means, throughout the test I assumed that only someone like Donald Trump or Hugh Heffner would ever pick 'strongly agree' for any of those, due to their widespread monetary and ego-inflating success. Also, "Self-Esteem" is an introspective measure, so pitting it against an external invariant scale seems a little untrustworthy.

Personally I give myself a 29/30, just because I know there's always room for improvement, and anyone named Rosenberg clearly has Self Esteem issues.



None.

Jan 15 2013, 12:26 am The Starport Post #4



18. I've got a weird way of perceiving things that often slows me down (but is occasionally helpful), otherwise I'd be much higher. I'd say the number is about right. For the time being, at least...

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Jan 16 2013, 12:10 am by Tuxlar.



None.

Jan 15 2013, 5:57 am Fire_Kame Post #5

wth is starcraft

this thread:






Jan 15 2013, 4:33 pm Centreri Post #6

Relatively ancient and inactive

Pretty sloppy test, I'd say. I agree with Vrael's criticisms, and I have my own I won't share. I got a 29. In light of what Vrael mentioned, I realize that I shouldn't have strongly agreed with being "very satisfied" with myself, as I am constantly trying to do better, which implies that I'm not actually satisfied.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[02:26 am]
Apos -- :wob:
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: MobMob