None.
SCDraft2 Unit text colors?
I thought there was a pallet for choosing text color for unit names in SCMDraft 2 but I don't see it anywhere. It's been years since I used the program but I could have sworn it was there. Do I have something disabled?
Cartography Artisan
You can't view them in SCMDraft while also looking at the unit name box; you could use this chart
You can see the available colors and mess around with unit names in SCMDraft from the string editor (Scenario --> Strings), assuming you're using the latest SCMDraft
You can see the available colors and mess around with unit names in SCMDraft from the string editor (Scenario --> Strings), assuming you're using the latest SCMDraft
TheNitesWhoSay - Clan Aura - github
Reached the top of StarCraft theory crafting 2:12 AM CST, August 2nd, 2014.
Reached the top of StarCraft theory crafting 2:12 AM CST, August 2nd, 2014.
An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death
There was never a pallet for SCMDraft. You're probably thinking of Starforge.
Another place to find the list of string colors is in the classic TrigEdit when you're creating/modifying a string.
Another place to find the list of string colors is in the classic TrigEdit when you're creating/modifying a string.
Learn how EUDs work: A Mapmaker's Guide for Creating EUDs
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Off topic but...
Title: it should be SCMDraft2 not SCDraft2.
Title: it should be SCMDraft2 not SCDraft2.
None.
Thanks for the help. Yeah I think it was Starforge now that you mention it. I used to use that to start my maps and finish them in SCMDraft2 back in the day.
None.
Starforge always corrupted my maps so I never used it, despite it being a bit more easier on the eyes than SCMDraft.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)
Members Online: Moose
Moose