None.
lil-Inferno said hi. In your face, Apostolique Zergkiller.
wth is starcraft
YOU SUCK.
Quote from 
Tempz
TempzH4rd n0t t0 br34k r()l3s.
Broken rules: 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Leon-037
Roy likes to stalk me every time I post.
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11.
+1 penalty.
Quote from 
lil-Inferno
lil-Infernohi
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 16.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Apos
AposInferno said hi.
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19, 22.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Raitaki
Raitakilil-Inferno said hi. In your face, Apostolique Zergkiller.
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 15.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Fire_Kame
Fire_KameYOU SUCK.
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11.
+1 penalty.
The winner of this game will receive up to 100 minerals.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 9 2011, 12:33 am by Azrael.Wrath.
I have to win this game.
None.
wth is starcraft
Quote from name:Azrael.Wrath
The winner of this game will receive up to 100 minerals.
NOTHING
Quote from Tempz
TempzI have to win this game.
Broken rules: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Fire_Kame
Fire_KameQuote from name:Azrael.Wrath
The winner of this game will receive up to 100 minerals.
NOTHING
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 13, 16.
+1 penalty.
Jack: +1 penalty.
Lanthanide: +2 penalty.
OlimarandLouie: +2 penalty.
Aristocrat: +4 penalty.
I am a good person. Hello, everyone! Nice to meet you! :3
None.
wth is starcraft
All hail Azrael.Wrath, glorious chairman and rightful ruler of everything beneath the heavens. Let us say a prayer in honor of him!
Quote from Leon-037
I am a good person. Hello, everyone! Nice to meet you! :3
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 16.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Fire_Kame
Fire_KameAll hail Azrael.Wrath, glorious chairman and rightful ruler of everything beneath the heavens. Let us say a prayer in honor of him!
Broken rules: 1, 3, 4, 7, 9.
+1 penalty.
Sacrieur: +1 penalty.
Still Napping
Such is agreed! May the silver moon alight your path.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 9 2011, 6:14 am by Sacrieur. Reason: Milkshakes.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 9 2011, 6:14 am by Sacrieur. Reason: Milkshakes.
None.
Still Napping
Rules are to be broken! But only in specific circumstances, of course. May you fare quite well in your quest.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 9 2011, 7:02 am by Sacrieur. Reason: Better than milkshakes? KITTEN AND MILK
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 9 2011, 7:02 am by Sacrieur. Reason: Better than milkshakes? KITTEN AND MILK
None.
Quote from Sacrieur
SacrieurRules are to be broken! But only in specific circumstances, of course. May you fare quite well in your quest.
Broken rules: 4, 7, 9, 11.
+1 penalty.
AAAAAAAAAAAA
None.
I order you to forgive yourself!
inb4lock
Lenin is returning. ASDGASYUFGWUIAFGH
None.
Quote from Tempz
TempzAAAAAAAAAAAA
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Apos
Aposinb4lock
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, 16.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Raitaki
RaitakiLenin is returning. ASDGASYUFGWUIAFGH
Broken rules: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 14, 16.
+1 penalty.
K_A: +1 penalty.
shadow649: +1 penalty.
Leon-037: +3 penalty.
Az (or anyone else) if you ever plan to do this sort of thing again, you should break the rules into content / syntax rules and positive / negative rules. As in, "posts must have pronouns in them" would be 'content' and "posts must have question marks or exclamation marks" would be syntax. A positive rule would be "post must do X" and a negative would be "post must not do X".
Then we'd have a much better chance of working the rules out.
For example, you would write:
Content rules broken: 1, 3, 4
Syntax rules broken: 2
Positive rules broken: 2, 6, 7
Negative rules broken, 4, 9.
Then we'd have a much better chance of working the rules out.
For example, you would write:
Content rules broken: 1, 3, 4
Syntax rules broken: 2
Positive rules broken: 2, 6, 7
Negative rules broken, 4, 9.
None.
I order you to forgive yourself!
Even better, you replace the rule numbers by their actual meaning.
Sometimes, I am impressed by my own ideas.
Sometimes, I am impressed by my own ideas.
Quote from Lanthanide
LanthanideAz (or anyone else) if you ever plan to do this sort of thing again, you should break the rules into content / syntax rules and positive / negative rules. As in, "posts must have pronouns in them" would be 'content' and "posts must have question marks or exclamation marks" would be syntax. A positive rule would be "post must do X" and a negative would be "post must not do X".
Then we'd have a much better chance of working the rules out.
For example, you would write:
Content rules broken: 1, 3, 4
Syntax rules broken: 2
Positive rules broken: 2, 6, 7
Negative rules broken, 4, 9.
Then we'd have a much better chance of working the rules out.
For example, you would write:
Content rules broken: 1, 3, 4
Syntax rules broken: 2
Positive rules broken: 2, 6, 7
Negative rules broken, 4, 9.
Broken rules: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11.
+1 penalty.
Quote from Apos
AposEven better, you replace the rule numbers by their actual meaning.
Sometimes, I am impressed by my own ideas.
Sometimes, I am impressed by my own ideas.
Broken rules: 1, 4, 9, 16.
+1 penalty.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)
Members Online: Moose
Moose