Anyway, yeah. Everyone except me is why SEN can't have nice things.

This is how SD works:

No one besides Mini Moose, JaFF and JaBoK are to be taken seriously. Everyone else should not bother posting. Simply put, you're not worthy. Course, I broke my own rule yesterday in replying to Jack. But at least I know what a piece of shit I am, and had previously made the effort to comply with it by getting myself banned.

This is how LD works:
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL serious serious LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

I'm finding this more of a troll topic more than anything XD

Aww...

"Spam" maybe, but not really trolling.

You don't post in SD anyway Devlin,

more like

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL serious serious LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL medical abnormality LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Centreri #2.

Anyways, most people on SD argue for the side they believe in. Most people believe in atheistic or evolutionary views around here. I try to promote discussion of all major viewpoints, and try to keep people from ruling things out without fair consideration and actively try to resist over-representation of a single side.

Sounds like a fancy justification for trolling them, Cecil.

And, yes, Vrael IS getting to be like me! More and more every day!

I don't see playing devil's advocate as equivalent to trolling, especially if brought up to spark legitimate discussion. It is okay to understand a point of view by looking at it from an opposing perspective (which is often how I look at things generally), and in our SD or LD topics, I see no issue with bringing up a point of view from the opposing side to clarify a point or better discuss a topic. If someone is doing it to deliberately incite people (which is what I consider to be "trolling" most of the time), then that is different. That's just someone being an asshole to be an asshole. There is a clear difference to me.

This topic makes me feel like this guy

Well i post in both sd and ld and sd is just more straight talks while ld is more a regular conversation like irl.

But that's all he does though. You're doing more than entertaining a thought when that's litterally the only side you've represented throughout the whole discussion.

Also, don't insult Vrael by comparing him to Cent. Vrael almost always has a coherent and fresh point of view on things, and I never "tl;dr" his posts. Cent has become predictable.

Aka you don't like Cent or I as much as you like Vrael? I don't know why honestly think the way you do about me moderating, other than I delete your spammy posts.

...I thought this thread was something like "Soft Definition" and "Low Definition" work or something like that...

You just made that shit fucking up haha

No need to get defensive, I'm not trying to usurp your lonely throne. If you read what I said, I just said I'm unaccustomed to the change. Never said it was bad, or you were a bad moderator.

Other people did, though. I wasn't expecting everyone to agree with me and take it a step further.

I guess if one atheist says something, you just lump us all together and consider we all said it. Now that might be something worth complaining about.

I want everyone to go read Will's latest post in the "Targeting Christianity" thread. That's what an SD quality post right there. Notice specifically that he didn't refer to a dictionary at any point.

Lol, it's usually really necessary to define things so that everyone understand the same meaning of stuff.

Only if someone is stupid enough to enter a discussion without understanding the meaning of a key concept. In which case they're not worth arguing against and should be ignored. If you're going to be defining basic words during a discussion, you're doing it wrong.