Staredit Network > Forums > SC2 General Discussion > Topic: StarCraft Gaining American Interest?
StarCraft Gaining American Interest?
Dec 10 2010, 12:22 am
By: Fisty  

Dec 17 2010, 1:28 am CecilSunkure Post #21



Quote from BeDazed
Life is intrinsically pointless.
Naive.



None.

Dec 17 2010, 2:37 am Fisty Post #22



My motivation for this topic was merely the gradual change occurring where I live. I don't bother to watch Launches because I generally can't afford a full priced game so I never saw how popular it was, but in my neck of the woods (Canada, eh?) the only people I knew who played StarCraft were korean, until now. It's more of an underground movement here... But nice to see people playing something other than COD (which I predict a full stop in success soon (meaning 2 years or so)).



None.

Dec 17 2010, 2:45 am BeDazed Post #23



Quote from CecilSunkure
Quote from BeDazed
Life is intrinsically pointless.
Naive.
And there might be a time when you miss being naive too.

But I was stating from Cardinal's point of view. This topic in a sense is pointless, but everyday life is in that sense- pointless. From that view, everything does not have any grand scheme in the higher sense. I was actually retorting that what he said was stupid, and should refrain from saying 'something is pointless'.



None.

Dec 17 2010, 2:51 am UnholyUrine Post #24



Quote from BeDazed
Quote from CecilSunkure
Quote from BeDazed
Life is intrinsically pointless.
Naive.
And there might be a time when you miss being naive too.

But I was stating from Cardinal's point of view. This topic in a sense is pointless, but everyday life is in that sense- pointless. From that view, everything does not have any grand scheme in the higher sense. I was actually retorting that what he said was stupid, and should refrain from saying 'something is pointless'.

Err, Guys? http://www.staredit.net/forums/25/ ?
Get back to where you once belong!



(is it me, or is the video thing broken? .. link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6G7MkBMVxE)

@Topic -

I think making SC2 a trilogy was a great business move by Blizzard. It triples their income, and also at least guarantees a 6 year lifespan of SC2. But after all that, if they fail to meet even just B.net 1 standards, the game will quickly dwindle back into solely koreans and die-hards again. What they need to do is surpass our expectations. In that sense, they failed horribly.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 17 2010, 2:57 am by UnholyUrine.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zycorax