Then forum questions and replies could be a lot easier to follow and understand.
http://www.staredit.net/topic/12325/
None.
So for example if someone replied to my question with a key word like "Site Operation" related to the SC2 editor, either the poster would have the ability to hint to staredit.net this should be in the wiki, or staredit.net would automatically sense this and provide an explanation bubble when a user hovers over the text or a link to the full wiki pages.
Then forum questions and replies could be a lot easier to follow and understand.
http://www.staredit.net/topic/12325/
Then forum questions and replies could be a lot easier to follow and understand.
http://www.staredit.net/topic/12325/
If the poster could mark it as "sense-able" text, then why wouldn't they just link to the relevant wiki article? This feature would be redundant.
And auto-detection would very quickly become a nuisance, not to mention the lag that would likely happen because the site would be running (what would eventually become) a whole dictionary of keyword matches on every post.
And auto-detection would very quickly become a nuisance, not to mention the lag that would likely happen because the site would be running (what would eventually become) a whole dictionary of keyword matches on every post.
None.
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
I find that annoying. I hate that bubbles. 
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
What bubbles?
Our wiki doesn't have a strong base right now, and as long as people don't update it, it will fall into disuse. I'm all for ways to make it more likely to be wikified, but certainly not bubbles. Perhaps a wiki tag, but as it stands now, we have 2 separate wikis.
Our wiki doesn't have a strong base right now, and as long as people don't update it, it will fall into disuse. I'm all for ways to make it more likely to be wikified, but certainly not bubbles. Perhaps a wiki tag, but as it stands now, we have 2 separate wikis.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Quote from 
rockz
rockzWhat bubbles?
Our wiki doesn't have a strong base right now, and as long as people don't update it, it will fall into disuse. I'm all for ways to make it more likely to be wikified, but certainly not bubbles. Perhaps a wiki tag, but as it stands now, we have 2 separate wikis.
Our wiki doesn't have a strong base right now, and as long as people don't update it, it will fall into disuse. I'm all for ways to make it more likely to be wikified, but certainly not bubbles. Perhaps a wiki tag, but as it stands now, we have 2 separate wikis.
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
:payne:
Quote from 
DavidJCobb
DavidJCobbauto-detection would very quickly become a nuisance, not to mention the lag that would likely happen because the site would be running (what would eventually become) a whole dictionary of keyword matches on every post.
None.
The problem would probably be that several things would not be sensed, IE, something with a bit different spelling (Such as behavior versus behaviour), or things with different capitalization. Not only that but poking the wiki to see if the article exists could become very resource intensive, as the parser would have to check every combination of words in the post to see if it exists in the wiki, while also performing BBCode transformations, etc. It probably wouldn't work.
I would be down for a Wiki BBCode, maybe with some hint text on it, but that would be about it, at least all that is feasible.
I would be down for a Wiki BBCode, maybe with some hint text on it, but that would be about it, at least all that is feasible.
None.
ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!
Quote from Jack
JackPeople DO actually update the wiki quite a bit
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Quote from rockz
rockzQuote from Jack
JackPeople DO actually update the wiki quite a bit
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-6-06. : 5:17 pm]
Oh_Man -- so i was today years old wen i learned rebel yell starcraft mission is named after a billy idol song. makes me wonder wat other missions are named after songs[2026-6-01. : 4:03 pm]
IskatuMesk -- no Hello World? No Hello . jpeg? Not even ddosing some government website? smh my head[2026-5-31. : 9:17 pm]
Ultraviolet -- hell yeah. did you have trouble making the button functional, or just haven't gotten there yet?[2026-5-31. : 8:29 pm]
Symmetry -- I made the marine shoot lasers and gave the medic a nonfunctional button[2026-5-31. : 8:07 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: I did my first EUD thing today. Feels like me finding arsenal at age 8 again
haha for sure. in some ways it's even more exciting because you can play EUD maps on regular battle.net, don't need to convince someone to download your mod to play with you. what did you do?
Members Online: 
O)FaRTy1billion[MM], DarkenedFantasies, Zoan, Excalibur
O)FaRTy1billion[MM], DarkenedFantasies, Zoan, Excalibur