The title explains it eveything.
Editor is too confusing... please answer soon and also tell me what views do you use so its not so complex
None.
Help please!
The title explains it eveything.
Editor is too confusing... please answer soon and also tell me what views do you use so its not so complex
The title explains it eveything.
Editor is too confusing... please answer soon and also tell me what views do you use so its not so complex
Praetor
As many as possible. >:3
Can you send the map my way? Maybe if I had it, I could find the solution.
Can you send the map my way? Maybe if I had it, I could find the solution.
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)
Members Online: Zoan, Ultraviolet, DarkenedFantasies
Zoan, Ultraviolet, DarkenedFantasies