I love the new layout guys, I really do. Don't get me wrong; it's beautiful. Butttttt, what in the eff is up with this site's lag? Like honestly, ever since the new SEN, it takes me 2 minutes to log-in. Is this something that can be fixed soon?
Here's my main point on all of this (it's more than just a personal annoyance):
-If the purpose of the new 'layout' was to attract a bigger audience for SC2- the major site lag is going to send people away faster than any flashy layout would bring people in.
Just my thoughts.
None.
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
I'd also like for a skin to be made that's low on images, like VERY LOW, as it's chewing up my internet cap and we're already at the limit now
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
WTF are you doing if you use more than 500 MB a day? One online video takes up more bandwidth than a year of SEN use.
I experience no lag.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
I use dial up or a phone to access SEN and I experience no lag.
Magic box god; Suck it Corbo
I actually had a log in problem in the old SEN too. I got around it by clicking log in and after a few seconds I clicked on forum index. I stopped having to do that when I clicked on the keep me signed in button though.
EDIT: Still have the problem but I'm always signed in so it doesn't affect me anymore
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Aug 15 2010, 2:47 pm by Wing Zero.
I use dial up or a phone to access SEN and I experience no lag.
You have all just been pwned to the fuckin' floor.
No lag here either.
Relatively ancient and inactive
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
None.
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
When there are over 5000 members, there's bound to be some lag when the sql search is done.
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
When there are over 5000 members, there's bound to be some lag when the sql search is done.
Perhaps we need to do some cleaning.
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
When there are over 5000 members, there's bound to be some lag when the sql search is done.
Perhaps we need to do some cleaning.
Or alphabetize the database and do a smarter search, but I don't care =p.
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
When there are over 5000 members, there's bound to be some lag when the sql search is done.
Perhaps we need to do some cleaning.
You should! There are 2298 members who haven't been active since December 31 2008.
None.
Relatively ancient and inactive
... Really? A search of five thousand can have that much of an effect? Two minutes?
I reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaally doubt it. Plus, I never had this problem, and if it took a significant amount of time I don't see why that would fluctuate; probably another problem somewhere.
None.
42 searches per second isn't that slow.
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
When there are over 5000 members, there's bound to be some lag when the sql search is done.
Perhaps we need to do some cleaning.
This. Check for all the members who have been inactive for over three months and delete their entries. Simple.
None.
Magic box god; Suck it Corbo
3 months is a bit harsh, maybe 1 year.
A few people are complaining about slow login time, so there's probably not lag but a crappy coding there.
When there are over 5000 members, there's bound to be some lag when the sql search is done.
Perhaps we need to do some cleaning.
This. Check for all the members who have been inactive for over three months and delete their entries. Simple.
How about a one year cleaning semi-annually?
Relatively ancient and inactive
Hrrm. Maybe it searches based on ID, and it's quick for me because I have a low ID? That would make sense, actually.
Still, I don't recall having this problem on v4 or even hear about it ever before on another system. I think there are ways to work around it.
None.
I do think we need to remove accounts that have little to no posts and have been inactive. I'm sure Moose, Devourer, or Jacob can come up with an algorithm, generate a list, and we can go from there. Even though this is something to my knowledge SEN has never done, we leave accounts there forever, I think once we start going to accounts that haven't been used since v5 started, it'd be much more likely said user wasn't coming back.
42 searches per second isn't that slow.
Hash fucking table.
Legacy code is probably the cause here. I haven't logged in for ages though, so
.
None.
