Staredit Network > Forums > Modding Assistance > Topic: Carrier Shadow image -- where is it used?
Carrier Shadow image -- where is it used?
May 12 2010, 7:46 am
By: asymptote  

May 12 2010, 7:46 am asymptote Post #1



All other air units have an 'imgul' command to load their shadow images, which are just their normal GRP using the shadow method of drawing.

Carriers however do not use the imgul command, yet they have a shadow!

Also in decompiling *all* of the IScript.bin into IScript.txt, there are no references to image 113 which is the Carrier Shadow. I then ran a search in IScript.bin with a hex editor for single bytes with value 0x51 (113) and came up with only one result, which I think leads nowhere: "47 00 05 01 00 51 00 05 01 00"

What's going on!? Is the shadow for the Carrier hard-coded? Is it referenced in one of the DAT files or something?

I'd really like to get to the bottom of this, any insight would be appreciated!



None.

May 12 2010, 10:59 pm Polaris Post #2



The carrier uses the IceCC opcode "imgulnextid." From the opcode description: " * imgulnextid 0x3d - <x> <y> - displays an active image overlay at the shadow animation level at a specified offset position. The image overlay that will be displayed is the one that is after the current image overlay in images.dat."



If anything cool is ever going on Skype me up under the name "blarghle"

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zoan