None.
Relatively ancient and inactive
Skinning can very easily stand independently from modeling, and based on observations of WCIII mapping websites, they are both active enough to warrant individual topics. Theory, on the other hand, will probably be a small, useless forum where people do... well, nothing. Whatever, I'm not going to argue more about this.
Quote from 
payne
payneI'm at 533% of the limited space, I mean... no way I go read all my threads to delete useless files and all. I think there shouldn't be any limit. After all, we've only rarely seen real-pure junk hosted on this site.
Quote from Devourer
DevourerLimits are needed.
I partly agree with both of you. First of all, I'm a pretty new member, only been here for a couple months now, and for some reason I'm at 36% global space. I have 38 posts total and haven't really done much here.
On the other hand, there DO need to be limits, just not ridiculously hefty ones
None.
Limits should have been lifted for attachments while I devise a new method and space requirements.
Most likely new members will have a storage limit, regulars will have some obscene amount, and veterans / elites will be unlimited.
Instead, attachments will be monitored and if you're uploading crap, you will be marked in such a way that you won't be able to upload anything new unless you delete some of the unnecessary stuff.
Most likely new members will have a storage limit, regulars will have some obscene amount, and veterans / elites will be unlimited.
Instead, attachments will be monitored and if you're uploading crap, you will be marked in such a way that you won't be able to upload anything new unless you delete some of the unnecessary stuff.
None.
I think it would be fine to put both SC 1 and 2 on the same page, but i would like having SC1 first. Having to look through all the SC2 stuff is torture.
Also, I've noticed that we can't subscribe to topics anymore. Could we bring this back? It was quite convenient.
Also, I've noticed that we can't subscribe to topics anymore. Could we bring this back? It was quite convenient.
None.
perhaps a forum for the data editor?
None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 