>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
New build:
WD caviar black 500GB - 63
Powercolor 4870 1GB - 133
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO - 110
Generic DVD RW - 28
Acer V203Hb TFT - 129
RAIDMAX Tornado - 53
Silverstone Strider ST50F - 76
Phenom II X2 555 Callisto - 66
RAM - Working on it, will update later, but about 66 bucks.
Total of 724 USD.
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
Unless there's a good reason for getting the asus 785, the gigabyte 790 is better.
Both are excellent chipsets, but the 785 comes with onboard, which should serve you no purpose. Not to mention, $80 for almost any gigabyte ATX motherboard is a steal.
Careful when unlocking cores on the callisto. There's a pretty good chance that you won't be able to.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
The 785 is because the 790 I found was DDR2 only, and the other 790s are a fair bit more expensive.
If unlocking the cores doesn't work, I can either send it back or just use it as a dualcore.
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
If I can get kingston DDR3 cheaper than corsair DDR3, should I? Or is corsair worth the extra dollars?
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
I wouldn't go with Kingston, the one time I dared use some of their RAM on a build for a friend, it was nothing but problems and errors.
I've used Kingston plenty of times in customer machines and in my own machines, every company is bound to give you a bad experience at some time or another, and simply deciding they must be bad after one try is an oversimplification, I'd say if the Kingston RAM is the cheapest for the quality, go with it.
None.
>cheapest
>quality
choose one.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
