Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Stupid Lindsay Lohan.
Stupid Lindsay Lohan.
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 10 2010, 6:43 pm
By: Super Duper  

Mar 10 2010, 6:43 pm Super Duper Post #1



http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/lindsay-lohan-cried-to-her-mommy-after-seeing-e-trade-ad-1970241
Heres the actual ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEXZ2hfD3bU
Do you think this is right?
I mean, honestly, do you think that Lindsay Lohan could be considered smart at all?
She has to get through her thick head, she is already a millionaire, she doesnt need more money. The stuff about her crying to her mommy is complete BS.
"Dina said Lindsay -- who filed a $100 million lawsuit Monday, demanding that E*Trade stop running the ad and turn over all copies to her -- became "extremely upset" at the ad because she felt it poked fun at her wild past."
Really? $100 million dollars? You ever think how many Lindsay's are in the USA? I can bet, about... Hmm... 100 thousand?
So, its a pretty common name, then?
Not only does Lindsay complain that its named after her, but she thinks E*Trade is saying she is a "Milkaholic", hinting that they think Lindsay is an alcoholic.
Now, I dont know the history of Lindsay Lohan, but if she DID drink or IS drinking, it doesnt matter anyways. The ad is innocent and everything was a big coincidence.
She also complains the baby looks a lot like her.
...
Did you just call yourself a baby?

...People these days, if they arent selling drugs or robbing banks, they are suing innocent, yet funny, ads.
Discuss.



None.

Mar 10 2010, 7:02 pm Fire_Kame Post #2

wth is starcraft

The slideshows of how she changed are really creepy.




Mar 10 2010, 7:41 pm phlemhacker Post #3



Must. Not.....Rant!



None.

Mar 10 2010, 8:34 pm Doodle77 Post #4



It's really quite astounding how little I care.



None.

Mar 10 2010, 8:40 pm Super Duper Post #5



Quote from Doodle77
It's really quite astounding how little I care.
Oh.
Thanks for contributing SO much to this thread. I really like how constructive and detailed and important how your post was. Thank you.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[02:26 am]
Apos -- :wob:
[2026-9-11. : 9:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zycorax, lifebot