Consider this a branch off of my serious relationship topic, because I really don't think most of you get it. I'm really looking forward to your responses, because I know that most of you see this as a give all or give nothing situation.

Would you be willing to assume 100% of someone else's debt, lifestyle, and emotions, knowing fully well that you cannot provide for yourself in any of these ways?

No discussion needed.

No, why would I want these things?

Kame, I'm going to go to the staff forum and propose limiting you to creating one topic a week.

In response to your thread: No.

*Looks at poll results*

FYI, voting "yes" does not make your e-penis any longer. Those who voted yes are naivetes.

Are you saying like, if we had the choice to sacrifice our freedom of will in order to protect someone?
Or are you saying, if we had the choice to cease existing and feel everything someone else does without being able to make any decisions?

Because they're damn different and can sway my vote.

Fairly sure he means the former.

But Kame's topics are the only ones I bother reading...



And if I don't have the capability to provide for myself I have no business providing for others.

:love:

Yes (but not 100% yes on lifestyle) some people live weird but that is okay sometimes.

I don't know, I've never found myself in that situation. I could probably be made to do it somehow, but when I'm thinking rationally, hell-naw.

Oops... I voted being reading the post..

It asked me "would you?..."
so I said Yes!

Kame, asking for advice about relationships at SEN is a bad idea.

Indeed.

"Weekly Trolling Thread".

Just because Kame makes it to troll (which I somewhat doubt) doesn't make it a bad or uninteresting thread. The worst thing here is the sheer amount of spammy people deciding to give unrelated advice.

Kame, I have done it before and several times after. I wouldn't call it not learning from my past mistakes, I like supporting my significant other if that is what you are talking about. I even proposed to marry a girl I had been dating for a month, simply to help her out via tax payer's money seeing as I am in the military.

In short, life is meant to live here and now, if the person is at least a fun and loving person who has just taken on a tolling lifestyle, I would have no problem with it at all. However, if it is an empty relationship with no room to grow, I say no. If it's in the former context, I am voting yes.

I can't provide emotions, debt or lifestyle?

Apparently my first attempt to convey my feelings was mean. So let's try again. You need to calm down. I'm *not* doing any harm. These forums are here for light, general discussion. So if you want to petition anything, maybe you should just petition to get rid of this subsection altogether. However, I doubt many people would like that.

Quote from Fire_Kame

Would you be willing to assume 100% of someone else's debt, lifestyle, and emotions, knowing fully well that you cannot provide for yourself in any of these ways?

I consider this light trolling...but that is assuming that the intent of the italicized sentence is to imply that we cannot provide these things for ourselves. However, I'm going to continue as if I had never read into the sentence, and that I am oblivious to the obvious.

If I cannot provide things for myself, I will not ask anyone to share in helping me out of my idiocy/misfortune, especially at the risk of the other individual losing his/her possessions, financial stability, and/or emotional well-being.

Not only did you read into it too far, you also misunderstood the question...