Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: G4 - The channel
G4 - The channel
Sep 28 2007, 1:18 am
By: Money  

Oct 27 2007, 7:12 am frazz Post #21



Quote from dumbducky
It was good a few years ago, but then everything started to go downhill a few months after they merged with techtv.
More like shot Tech TV in the back of the head and ate it's brains out.

Sorry, I couldn't resist pointing that out.



None.

Oct 29 2007, 2:28 am dumbducky Post #22



I never watched TechTv, so I wouldn't know :P

But the initial merger with TechTvV was good, but that was when they started to add programming that sucked.



tits

Nov 7 2007, 5:35 am Cnl.Fatso Post #23



TechTV was total awesome! It had shows that were actually relevant. There was something on that channel for every type of tech buff. G4 has nothing on them.

Quote
More like shot Tech TV in the back of the head and ate it's brains out.

Just swallowed whole, really. No need to make it any more gruesome than it already is.



None.

Nov 7 2007, 6:01 am Twitch Post #24



Quote from Cnl.Fatso
TechTV was total awesome! It had shows that were actually relevant. There was something on that channel for every type of tech buff. G4 has nothing on them.

Quote
More like shot Tech TV in the back of the head and ate it's brains out.

Just swallowed whole, really. No need to make it any more gruesome than it already is.
You mean shows like junkyard wars and robot wars that soooooooo owned :).



None.

Nov 23 2007, 10:34 pm frazz Post #25



Just a thought, G4's best show is a Japanese import. It probably accounts for 25 % of their advertising income.

Pathetic.



None.

Nov 23 2007, 11:10 pm A_of-s_t Post #26

aka idmontie

Quote from frazz
Just a thought, G4's best show is a Japanese import. It probably accounts for 25 % of their advertising income.

Pathetic.
Ninjah Worriah.



Personal GitHub
Starcraft GitHub Organization - Feel free to request member status!
TwitchTV

Nov 24 2007, 12:41 am frazz Post #27



The network does dishonor to the show.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: jun3hong, DarkenedFantasies