I worked on this for about fifteen minutes. I'm sure it's been done before, but I want to see if you all think it's good and low on the blocks. I'm just now getting into terraining.
I worked on this for about fifteen minutes. I'm sure it's been done before, but I want to see if you all think it's good and low on the blocks. I'm just now getting into terraining.
It's good man. Looks very sexy.
None.
Hello
It's really good but, as said, it's not new so people won't be that amazed 
.
.Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Nice job! There are some fixes you could do, though. The far left corner cliffs should match. Also, most of the top 2 tiles for the front cliffs don't match with the bottom 2. Look at the cliff version and use that as a reference. (not a big deal, but would make the piece better)
None.
Actually, it is a big deal because it creates unnecessary blocks.
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
Members Online: RIVE
RIVE