HTML
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Oct 11 2007, 10:33 pm
By: blacklight28
Pages: < 1 2 3 >
 
Polls
HTML in SeN
HTML in SeN
Answer Votes Percentage % Voters
Yes 4
 
16%
None.
No 21
 
84%
None.
Please login to vote.
Poll has 25 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

Oct 13 2007, 3:38 pm Jello-Jigglers Post #21



So can you not use bb for quotes and html for the rest? that would be awfully convenient :)



None.

Oct 13 2007, 4:19 pm Syphon Post #22



Quote from Jello-Jigglers
So can you not use bb for quotes and html for the rest? that would be awfully convenient :)

No it wouldn't! It'd be bbcode with carets.



None.

Oct 13 2007, 4:45 pm Minority Post #23



Quote from Jello-Jigglers
So can you not use bb for quotes and html for the rest? that would be awfully convenient :)
How would that be convenient? You'd have two different types of tag to type in, and if we DID have HTML enabled, we'd only be able to do what we can already do in BBCodes. Like I said before, BBCodes can do whatever HTML can do, and MORE.



None.

Oct 14 2007, 1:08 pm Symmetry Post #24

Dungeon Master

It's easier to type a [ than a <. It doesn't require shift. So no, it wouldn't be more convenient in ANY way :P



:voy: :jaff: :voy: :jaff:

Oct 15 2007, 9:06 am AfterLifeLochie Post #25



I'm a HTML dude: even if BB is easier. What matters is the functions available and what limitations either has. Even a combination of both would be OK but that would need more programming (sorry!). I have done this kind of thing before so I wonder if... :D Mabey they should consider multi-language for those who dont know BB (like me :D).



None.

Oct 15 2007, 8:24 pm Kellimus Post #26



Quote from AfterLifeLochie
I'm a HTML dude: even if BB is easier. What matters is the functions available and what limitations either has. Even a combination of both would be OK but that would need more programming (sorry!). I have done this kind of thing before so I wonder if... :D Mabey they should consider multi-language for those who dont know BB (like me :D).

I think you mean it would need more Scripting ;)

HTML and Forums != Good idea.

Its been said numerous of times as to why, so why should I even repeat myself?



None.

Oct 15 2007, 8:34 pm Joshgt2 Post #27



Everything has been like this so far.. Why change it? I also like using BBCode for a lot of the things on here, lol



None.

Oct 15 2007, 9:21 pm Moose Post #28

meme

Because blindly following tradition without examination or questioning is not a good idea.




Oct 15 2007, 9:24 pm Kellimus Post #29



Quote from Mini Moose 2707
Because blindly following tradition without examination or questioning is not a good idea.

Exactly



None.

Oct 15 2007, 10:46 pm Syphon Post #30



Quote from Mini Moose 2707
Because blindly following tradition without examination or questioning is not a good idea.

But didn't HTML used to be enabled? :P



None.

Oct 15 2007, 10:52 pm Moose Post #31

meme

Yes, but I wasn't in charge, and there was barely a fraction of the population we have now.




Oct 16 2007, 1:35 am blacklight28 Post #32



I know a forum that uses HTML and nothing bad has happened there. Now you guys are giving everyone ideas on what they can do with HTML.



None.

Oct 16 2007, 1:45 am Moose Post #33

meme

I doubt their regular audience is similar to the demographics that SEN has to go up against.




Oct 16 2007, 2:58 am Syphon Post #34



Ya, you realise we have members hacking regularly with cross site SQL injection, right? :P



None.

Oct 23 2007, 2:11 am Money Post #35



That could cause problems?



None.

Oct 23 2007, 6:03 am blacklight28 Post #36



Quote from Killer_Kow
It's easier to type a [ than a <. It doesn't require shift. So no, it wouldn't be more convenient in ANY way :P

Nice reasoning. Got any more?



None.

Oct 23 2007, 2:49 pm Minority Post #37



Quote from AfterLifeLochie
Mabey they should consider multi-language for those who dont know BB (like me :D).
I'll give you some sample bbcodes to get you started:
To make text bold:
In BBCode: [ b]text[ /b] (without the spaces, of course).
In HTML: <b>text</b>

To make text italic:
In BBCode: [ i]text[ /i]
In HTML: <i>text</i>

Noticing a pattern here?

To make a quote:
In BBCode: [ quote=name]text[ /quote]
In HTML: <table style="border:1px dashed #333; background-color:#deadbeef"><tr><td>and so on.... </table>

Noticing a difference there?

Quote from blacklight28
Nice reasoning. Got any more?
Yes, we do. Read the rest of the damn thread.



None.

Oct 23 2007, 11:34 pm Syphon Post #38



Note that the XHTML tags for most of the bbcodes are actually deprecated.

Do YOU want SeN to not standards compliant?



None.

Oct 24 2007, 5:17 am Kellimus Post #39



Quote from Syphon
Note that the XHTML tags for most of the bbcodes are actually deprecated.

Do YOU want SeN to not standards compliant?

Not be standards compliant?? That's how I understand you... :P

Anywho, HTML just sucks compared to BBcode, and its been shown why..



None.

Oct 24 2007, 7:44 am blacklight28 Post #40



Quote from Minority
Quote from AfterLifeLochie
Mabey they should consider multi-language for those who dont know BB (like me :D).
I'll give you some sample bbcodes to get you started:
To make text bold:
In BBCode: [ b]text[ /b] (without the spaces, of course).
In HTML: <b>text</b>

To make text italic:
In BBCode: [ i]text[ /i]
In HTML: <i>text</i>

Noticing a pattern here?

To make a quote:
In BBCode: [ quote=name]text[ /quote]
In HTML: <table style="border:1px dashed #333; background-color:#deadbeef"><tr><td>and so on.... </table>

Noticing a difference there?

Quote from blacklight28
Nice reasoning. Got any more?
Yes, we do. Read the rest of the damn thread.

I wasn't talking to you dumbass. Read my post more carefully. Read better before you start being gay.

And like what Jello said. BBCodes for the easy stuff like quotes and HTML for the rest.



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 2 3 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: IskatuMesk