Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Imageshack Fail
Imageshack Fail
Jul 11 2009, 7:46 pm
By: Tempz  

Jul 11 2009, 7:46 pm Tempz Post #1



http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=692281
http://www.newscred.com/article/show/title/imageshack-hacked-by-anti-sec-movement-4a5800b7e42b5/1756536
http://www.softsailor.com/news/5763-imageshack-hacked-by-the-anti-sec-movement-more-to-follow.html

When I was posting images I found that some of the images I've posted became like this...
I'm confused whether a hacker got onto the site or someone at the site put this in.
Even though I realized that imageshack sucks,

But before this happened my ads were blocked (Ad block) which may be the reason anyways I still have to complain about this.

Finally it states that this movement is dedicated to hack any site that doesn't any anti virus/firewall/ect which is essentially trying to scare people into making them money, yet there movement is still unclear but this is all i've been able to piece together ....

Also note how the sign says ImageHacks
Image is on secound link

Post has been edited 5 time(s), last time on Jul 11 2009, 8:10 pm by Tempz.



None.

Jul 11 2009, 8:47 pm EzDay281 Post #2



Quote
But before this happened my ads were blocked (Ad block) which may be the reason
Which may be the reason what?
Quote
Finally it states that this movement is dedicated to hack any site that doesn't any anti virus/firewall/
uh... no it doesn't.
"We're a movement dedicated to the eradication of [...] the disclosure of exploits publicly [...] through the full [...] elimination of all supporters of full-disclosure [...]"
Quote
ect
I do so very hope that is a typo.
Quote
Also note how the sign says ImageHacks
Again, no. It still says "imageshack".

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jul 12 2009, 5:09 pm by EzDay281.



None.

Jul 12 2009, 2:23 pm Hug A Zergling Post #3



I'm a little confused to what it all means :wtfage:



None.

Jul 12 2009, 5:55 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #4



I've talked to people who work at Imageshack and the people working there don't deserve this, they're just an image hosting site, obviouly.

They're fighting fire with fire, basically. They're fighting with totalitarian tactics like this to disrupt the totalitarian methods of companies that provide security services engage in. Stupid.



None.

Jul 17 2009, 10:27 pm FatalException Post #5



But the public disclosure of security holes is what leads to security holes getting fixed... Are these guys really professionals?



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: lil-Inferno, O)FaRTy1billion[MM]