Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Hijacking my Wireless
Hijacking my Wireless
Jul 8 2009, 12:05 am
By: samsizzle  

Jul 9 2009, 10:18 am ShadowFlare Post #21



Quote from rockz
A fool couldn't break a MAC filter router. Therefore it's foolproof.
That's not the meaning of foolproof. :><: It is the verb form of fool that is used in that compound word, not the noun. One definition you could use would be "unable to be fooled"


Quote
WEP is breakable in 5 minutes. Seriously. And people still use it.
Actually, it is worse than that. Last I heard, it was possible to find the WEP key in about 40 seconds.



None.

Jul 9 2009, 7:09 pm Falkoner Post #22



Quote
A fool couldn't break a MAC filter router. Therefore it's foolproof.

MAC filtering actually works well, unless the person on the outside somehow knows your MAC Address, otherwise they have to brute-force MAC Addresses to get in.

WEP is by-far the easiest to break, WPA has two main forms, PSK, the easier one to break into, although still harder than WEP, and RADIUS, which is incredibly difficult to break into.



None.

Jul 9 2009, 7:49 pm samsizzle Post #23



well, i'll just change my security to Radius.

EDIT

Ok i tried making it radius protected but its asking for the radius server address. And theres four boxes with zeros that im assuming should have some sort of ip address. What should i put in there. Do you guys know of any radius servers?

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jul 9 2009, 8:56 pm by samsizzle.



None.

Jul 9 2009, 10:32 pm DT_Battlekruser Post #24



Then again, all your fancy plans probably don't stop a good autoconfig from getting access.



None.

Jul 11 2009, 4:14 pm Doodle77 Post #25



Quote from rockz
WEP is breakable in 5 minutes. Seriously. And people still use it.
This is exactly why i use it.



None.

Jul 13 2009, 12:02 am ShadowFlare Post #26



lol, for what purpose?



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:28 am]
Symmetry -- :wob:
[02:26 am]
Apos -- :wob:
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Oh_Man, Symmetry