Staredit Network > Forums > Modding Assistance > Topic: Giving buildings attacks
Giving buildings attacks
Jun 26 2009, 11:58 pm
By: Mantis  

Jun 26 2009, 11:58 pm Mantis Post #1



What is the proper way to give a building an attack so it will work properly? (I am posting this on behalf of my spanish modding friend).



None.

Jun 27 2009, 1:28 am Biophysicist Post #2



Give the building a weapon and attack animations (in iscript.bin). You might have to mess around with AI actions a bit, I'm not sure.



None.

Jun 27 2009, 4:13 am Lord_Jeremy Post #3



To be more specific, you essentially have to give the building's iscript all of the attack animations that a regular attacking unit has. For instance, you'll need to create/assign animations for the following headers: gndattkinit, gndattkrpt, gndattktoidle. If you want your thingy to attack air separately you'll also need to do stuff for the airattk... headers. Take a look at a simple unit like the vulture or the marine.



None.

Jun 29 2009, 9:46 pm Yawgmoth Post #4



Make sure to change the "Attack Angle" of the weapons.dat entry you use to 128. If you don't, there will be a crash unless your building's graphic turns.



None.

Jun 30 2009, 2:08 am ShadowFlare Post #5



Well, that's not the only way to do it (but probably the easiest). You can also give it proper settings in flingy.dat so that it can turn (the graphic itself doesn't need turning frames, only if you check the box in images.dat). In my experience, I haven't seen it crash from having too small of an attack angle, but it does make it so the building can only fire at things north of it if the building cannot turn and the angle is too small.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zoan