Ok thats it <.<
None.
Ok thats it <.<
Why do they get shrunk?
None.
I have no idea. But if you click on them, you should be able to view normal size.
None.
The image shrinking is the suck.
None.
Wow, BeDazed...those are some beautiful sigs there. I love your usage of scanlines.
Is that last Halo one taken? If not, could you add my name on it?
Is that last Halo one taken? If not, could you add my name on it?
None.
they are probably shrunken by the process of removing the skull, sowing the eyes nose mouth etc. and then smoking the head, this preserves the features.
but as for the signatures they havent probably tapped into the picture max function.
but as for the signatures they havent probably tapped into the picture max function.
None.
IF you're taking requests...I'd love to see you do something to that pic.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 29 2007, 1:57 am by TitanWing.
None.
Nice sigs 
too bad i have to click on each of them lol.
too bad i have to click on each of them lol.None.
Try photobucket man. pics usually comes out much better and nj... and some of those look pretty familiar when i was looking up halo3 things. If anyone has the lasest internet explorer you can enlarge the screen and it still comes out nicely
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 31 2007, 3:46 am by Fallen.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 31 2007, 3:46 am by Fallen.
None.
*que mindless masses of Firefoxers saying Fx is best*
I use IE7 personally and by simply clicking the pictures it opens a window with the full picture.
I use IE7 personally and by simply clicking the pictures it opens a window with the full picture.
None.
Quote from TitanWing
*que mindless masses of Firefoxers saying Fx is best*
I use IE7 personally and by simply clicking the pictures it opens a window with the full picture.
I use IE7 personally and by simply clicking the pictures it opens a window with the full picture.
You sir, are an idiot.
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[02:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier