Staredit Network > Forums > Media, Art, and Literature > Topic: Rate my Signature
Rate my Signature
Sep 18 2007, 12:10 am
By: Gradius
Pages: < 1 « 2 3 4 5 67 >
 

Oct 7 2007, 4:08 pm XGuy Post #61



:D Lakai, I like it but the text kinda kills it.

Right so I'm like a total noob at siging. Rate/comment/ways I can improove/etc.





None.

Oct 7 2007, 4:10 pm Dr. Shotgun Post #62



Needs a denser background and better text, but shows some promise. 5-6/10



None.

Oct 7 2007, 6:09 pm UnholyUrine Post #63



My sig matches my name... and that's all i really care about XD XD



None.

Oct 7 2007, 7:17 pm Lakai Post #64



Quote from XGuy
:D Lakai, I like it but the text kinda kills it.

Right so I'm like a total noob at siging. Rate/comment/ways I can improove/etc.


yeah text is my worst part :(

I like the text on yours :mudkip:



None.

Oct 9 2007, 3:03 am A_of-s_t Post #65

aka idmontie

What do you guys think of my siggy?





Personal GitHub
Starcraft GitHub Organization - Feel free to request member status!
TwitchTV

Oct 9 2007, 11:21 am BeDazed Post #66



1/10



None.

Oct 9 2007, 2:58 pm Joshgt2 Post #67



Quote from Gradius
Hey guys! My latest 2 sigs. Rate & comment.

Like the first one a lot man!



None.

Oct 9 2007, 5:41 pm BeDazed Post #68



New sig yet again.



None.

Oct 10 2007, 8:18 pm Lakai Post #69



I like it its just a little small for my liking



None.

Oct 10 2007, 10:46 pm Dr. Shotgun Post #70



Not feeling the text but otherwise good.



None.

Oct 11 2007, 12:42 am MadZombie Post #71



yea...maybe one "bedazeD" is enough :D



got a stock of optimus prime and did little things to it, mostly passed it throught filters :(

text looked better in photoshop :'-(



None.

Oct 11 2007, 2:33 am A_of-s_t Post #72

aka idmontie

Quote from BeDazed
1/10
OMFG, THX!!!! I ALWAYS WANTED MEANINGLESS NUMBERS WITH NOT EXPLINATION!!! YOU MADE MY DAY! Idiot.



Personal GitHub
Starcraft GitHub Organization - Feel free to request member status!
TwitchTV

Oct 11 2007, 2:54 am Joshgt2 Post #73



Quote from A_of-s_t
Quote from BeDazed
1/10
OMFG, THX!!!! I ALWAYS WANTED MEANINGLESS NUMBERS WITH NOT EXPLINATION!!! YOU MADE MY DAY! Idiot.
Wow chill man... You wanted a rating so he gave you one and you didn't ask for any explanation so he didn't give any... I will give you one though...
I give it a 1.5/10, reason why? It is simply too plain and too basic by what I go by. Maybe if I were to see the stock of it then I might change my answer but it looks like you got something off of Google and put some words on it.



None.

Oct 11 2007, 4:03 am A_of-s_t Post #74

aka idmontie

Quote from Joshgt
Quote from A_of-s_t
Quote from BeDazed
1/10
OMFG, THX!!!! I ALWAYS WANTED MEANINGLESS NUMBERS WITH NOT EXPLINATION!!! YOU MADE MY DAY! Idiot.
Wow chill man... You wanted a rating so he gave you one and you didn't ask for any explanation so he didn't give any... I will give you one though...
I give it a 1.5/10, reason why? It is simply too plain and too basic by what I go by. Maybe if I were to see the stock of it then I might change my answer but it looks like you got something off of Google and put some words on it.

Actually, thats is a hand made 3D model with a SC water backround. Actually, I believe there used to be a rule that stated that one cannot merely rate anything without given explanation; but, with this new SEN, I believe there are no rules.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 11 2007, 11:47 pm by A_of-s_t.



Personal GitHub
Starcraft GitHub Organization - Feel free to request member status!
TwitchTV

Oct 11 2007, 4:45 am BeDazed Post #75



Yeah. But it explains itself.
I think it sucks. Do I really have to spell it out for you?



None.

Oct 11 2007, 8:50 pm Dr. Shotgun Post #76



Quote from BeDazed
Yeah. But it explains itself.
I think it sucks. Do I really have to spell it out for you?
Yes.



None.

Oct 11 2007, 9:16 pm MadZombie Post #77



i thinks its jsut that we looked at it visualy and didnt know the work put into it.Becuase u ddnt say u made the boat from scratch ppl assumed it was a pic of a boat on a water bg. owell :O



None.

Oct 13 2007, 2:59 pm BeDazed Post #78



To MadZombie, your transformer sig looks pretty cool. Although a bit more depth and adding a border might help. Borders are generally good with 3 px black inside stroke.



None.

Oct 14 2007, 2:23 am j3hu7y Post #79



overall you should work a bit on the text
1-The focal is dark and everything else is bright, it should be the other way around for this imo
2-not clear
3-jim raynor sig- sorta boring, nothing happening
4-mehhh not really my style



None.

Oct 16 2007, 1:33 am MadZombie Post #80



Quote from BeDazed
To MadZombie, your transformer sig looks pretty cool. Although a bit more depth and adding a border might help. Borders are generally good with 3 px black inside stroke.
okay yea on that one it was ment for the sig to not be a rectangle, and then i was gonna add a border to it but for some reason it didnt save how i finished it so parts were missing lol...but 3 pxl border? thats kidna hardcore =( i only do 1pxl.

and anyways i usualy dont do borders or use movie borders since i usuly post the sigs in forums with dark bg's. And i dont know why but it feels mroe profesional without a border imo ;)

Anyways...

C&C? BTW... this anime character's vocie is played by samuel L jackson =)



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 « 2 3 4 5 67 >
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: NudeRaider