Click me.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 6 2007, 6:43 am by Paravin.. Reason: Small grammatic problem.
None.
Starcraft2.com has been updated with the Carrier, and good ol' Interceptors are still in it.
Click me.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 6 2007, 6:43 am by Paravin.. Reason: Small grammatic problem.
Click me.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 6 2007, 6:43 am by Paravin.. Reason: Small grammatic problem.
w00t! Awesome!
None.
and they look better than ever! 
smooth interceptors, cool new looking plasma cannons for the interceptors. And a slick new design for the carriers.
smooth interceptors, cool new looking plasma cannons for the interceptors. And a slick new design for the carriers.None.
I wonder if the carrier has some ability like most of the other units... hopefully they won't make it too insane xD
None.
Quote
I wonder if the carrier has some ability like most of the other units... hopefully they won't make it too insane xD
They now have the ability to auto-build interceptors...
None.
Neat.
None.
Awesome.
None.
Shogun
Sweet.
None.
Relatively ancient and inactive
It sure took a ton of time for three carriers to beat one battlecruiser, though, and the battlecruiser was able to tear through its' targets' defenses and probably get it to 1/2 life.
None.
Quote from MalFunkShun
Quote
I wonder if the carrier has some ability like most of the other units... hopefully they won't make it too insane xD
They now have the ability to auto-build interceptors...
Is that it? ;O Damn, Bc's stil gona own
None.
Quote from Centreri
It sure took a ton of time for three carriers to beat one battlecruiser, though, and the battlecruiser was able to tear through its' targets' defenses and probably get it to 1/2 life.
The animation was there to show the interceptors, not the power of the carrier
Quote
Originally Posted by Karune
The Carrier is not at all balanced in that video. The video is more showing off the animations involved in the Carrier's attack, so no need to worry about it being completely 'nerfed.'
The Carrier is not at all balanced in that video. The video is more showing off the animations involved in the Carrier's attack, so no need to worry about it being completely 'nerfed.'
Off SClegacy, too lazy to find the original B.NET post
None.
Quote from Screwed
I wonder if the carrier has some ability like most of the other units... hopefully they won't make it too insane xD
None.
Quote from Joshgt
Quote from Screwed
I wonder if the carrier has some ability like most of the other units... hopefully they won't make it too insane xD
Where did you get something like this?
None.
Its ok... but statistical information on the carrier has been released long time
None.
Quote from BeDazed
Neat.
Quote from JordanN
Awesome.
Quote from Crimson Magnum
Sweet.
Cool.
(yay for one word replys)
None.
Quote from Nintendo_Confed
Quote from BeDazed
Neat.
Quote from JordanN
Awesome.
Quote from Crimson Magnum
Sweet.
OK
is it nicer?
None.
Quote from Paravin.
Quote from Joshgt
Quote from Screwed
I wonder if the carrier has some ability like most of the other units... hopefully they won't make it too insane xD
Where did you get something like this?
hahaha... you see... I have the proff right here for you... Coming right from the August issue of PC Gamer magazine posted on page 29... I am going to give you the EXACT words of what it says about the Tempest (Carrier). "Tempest The Tempest is a dark carrier with disc fighters and a strong shield that activates only when attacked from the ground. It will have no defense whatsoever against air attacks." Now we all know that this does have defense against air attacks because it shows it in the little clip they play on StarCraft2.com but from what this says, the Carriers will have a special shield activating against ground targets. This may change but so far it is not known.
None.
Tempest? But the tempest is long gone! >_<
Me confused..
Me confused..
None.
Quote from Joshgt
...I am going to give you the EXACT words of what it says about the Tempest (Carrier)....
They changed the name on us but it still seems to be the same unit.
None.
Dude... in that video, that BC took FOREVER to kill!
None.
Options
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- SymmetrySymmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Members Online: IskatuMesk
IskatuMesk