Staredit Network > Forums > Serious Discussion > Topic: Homosexuality and Abortion.
Homosexuality and Abortion.
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 14 2009, 7:46 am
By: lSHaDoW-FoXl  

Mar 14 2009, 7:46 am lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #1



It seems there are two topics that every president prefers to avoid, simply because of how controversial they are. One of them in particular is something a lot of us has grown to accept, homosexuality. At the same time however, a lot of people cannot accept it because it conflicts there ideals, there religious beliefs, and they basically don't understand it. But, it's definitely better to be a homosexual and be hated by few, then be a homophobic, and hated by entire countries. However, why is it such a controversy? Why are there laws to condemn homosexuality in some states, and in some countries?

Then we move on to something even more controversial, and a matter that definitely requires debating, Abortion.
And after simply saying that word, there is no need for any further explanations, there is only opinions.

My personal opinion on these two topics is fairly generic in some ways, and fairly different. My opinion on homosexuality is entirely biased according to my first hand experiences in such. I find it's pretty sad to judge someone based off there preference, and it's even more sad when someone says it's ill natural. An argument I'd like to share, if it's ill natural then why would it be created in the first place? and furthermore, why would so much people have it, let alone species. And furthermore, if someone does wish to approach homosexuality in a religious way then they should also consider the commandments.

Lets be honest, no one can say they never broke at least one of them. And even more so, no one can state they never felt lust nor masturbated. Oh, right, and according to the bible it's also an abomination to eat shrimp, so I guess anyone that had such a pleasure is going to hell as well. My opinion on Abortion is twisted. When people say it's wrong, I often times ask ''What if the person was raped?'' they would often times reply, ''well, I guess it would be all right under that circumstance.'' One thing though. In a world as this, we cannot say ''NO.'' and turn back to say yes under a very few situations, it's either a simple yes for all matters or a simple no for all matters. It's also worth stating how much humans there are, and how much humans are orphans, or having horrible parents who mistreat them and make their life a living hell.

And another thing worth consideration is that by that time it's fetus is not even a baby, it's just a bunch of cells still forming.

Enough of my opinions though, does anyone else believe they can share their thoughts of this topic? Without profanity and hopefully well informed opinions.



None.

Mar 14 2009, 8:25 am Vrael Post #2



Shadow, please edit your topic to reflect ONE topic. There's no rule against creating two topics, but sticking two completely unrelated topics together is rather silly. It's nothing but promoting a lot of confusing discussion and off topic responses, so I'm going to go ahead and lock this. Technically there's no rule against sticking two topics in one topic either, but this isn't going to work out very well. If you clean it up, PM me and I'll be happy to unlock it.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[04:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically
[04:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?
[04:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings
[06:15 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.
[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.
[2026-6-20. : 3:43 pm]
NudeRaider -- Contained nothing new for me. Didn't know all building's behavior, but very much all unit's. Also Terran balance whine - also nothing new :lol:
[2026-6-19. : 9:57 am]
Oh_Man -- makes me wonder if SEN knows anything about the topic
[2026-6-19. : 9:57 am]
Oh_Man -- artosis dropped pretty interesting vid: https://youtu.be/EqZHB8Blra4
[2026-6-18. : 5:01 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2026-6-17. : 6:15 am]
RexyRex -- :wob:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Prankenstein, RIVE