Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: After cracking this map......
After cracking this map......
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Oct 2 2007, 6:52 am
By: mayafei  

Oct 2 2007, 6:52 am mayafei Post #1



It's very serious.

There are many unused strings in my map.I only want to delete them.So I protect my map by using the CPP Test Protector.Then use OSMAP to unprotect it.

But after cracking.The strings become worse.

If I use OSMAP(1.00m) to crack it.It will become worse.
Here is the screenshot.

If I use Unused to crack it.It will become much worse.

The map is here: http://www.mayafei.cn/crack.rar
(Use Winrar to open it.)

Attachments:
2.JPG
Hits: 13 Size: 68.23kb

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 2 2007, 6:59 am by mayafei.



None.

Oct 2 2007, 8:26 am Excalibur Post #2

The sword and the faith

Its probobly the protection messing up the strings. Im pretty certain.
Ive had no issues to date from OSMAP. Ill contact LW.

Now that im thinking about this the protector could be trying some new type of protection (As ive never heard of this one your using) and OSMAP hasnt been modified to effectively counter its specific way of doing things resulting in strings taking a hit. Im not too sure though. Its my experiance that certain protections are what causes string corruption. Maps are pretty picky about what theyll let protect them. If all else fails try ProEdit, it usually works where these newer programs mess up.




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Oct 2 2007, 12:26 pm Gerrard2060 Post #3



Are you sure you use OSMAP 2?



None.

Oct 2 2007, 1:42 pm mayafei Post #4



Quote from Gerrard2060
Are you sure you use OSMAP 2?

i'm sure.If you didnt believe me.you can have a try.i uploaded the map.

i used OSMAP2 1.00m to crack it.




None.

Oct 2 2007, 8:16 pm Moose Post #5

Armor: 90.50%

Okay, I'm all for discussing the ethics of OSMAP, but turning this place into the OSMAP bug report and improvements forum isn't going to happen. You either get on Maplantis, PM Legacy, or just e-mail him ( legacyweapon at gmail ).




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
[03:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- (and yes, I capitalized that correctly :ego:)
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: MobMob, Symmetry, Shishani