Staredit Network > Forums > SC2 General Discussion > Topic: I'm disappointed, tbfh
I'm disappointed, tbfh
Aug 30 2007, 11:25 am
By: Forsaken Archer  

Sep 11 2007, 5:43 pm Lt.Church Post #21



im abit dissappointed with alot of the looks, the probes used to look nice and cute now they look weird and ugly; minerals dont even look like minerals anymore but on the positive side the zealots looked okay :><:



None.

Sep 13 2007, 4:59 am Ei47 Post #22



I agree with you on some points, a bunch of the units look cartoony, siege tank mostly. But more I hate how the units move. Stalker looks like it's bouncing 3 feet every time it moves, and the fighters move hellla slooooooooow. But there are some good things, the colosulus looks sickly awsaume in every way. And even though the Thor seems a bit rigged, it looks damn fine to me :) But for UMS maps i'm a bit nervous about terrain hopper units, it would destroy the concept of fortress maps completly, so i'm hoping you can disable cliff hopping for reapers/colosulus/Viking. :D and i hope they add a port sc1 maps to sc2 XD but i doubt it.



None.

Sep 27 2007, 4:24 pm Paravin. Post #23



As long as they don't remove the Banshee or Colossus, I'm ok with SC2.
But ''War of the Worlds'' maps with the Colly are so going to rock. :D

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 27 2007, 4:25 pm by Paravin.. Reason: Forgot s, in Worlds.



None.

Sep 27 2007, 10:09 pm JordanN Post #24



Quote from isolatedpurity
How about something like Battalion wars (and a few other games) where not only is there the entire RTS system, you can take control of a unit and command it like a FPS. Micromanage that unit at it's finest: dodge those rockets. I don't know... SOMETHING. Milk the cow for what it's worth, I guess.

Great minds think alike I suppose. That was also my original idea for what starcraft 2 should of been like. You bring a crap load of zerglings to a base and take part in the action as well or play as a ghost and have the first eye view of a nuke dropping. It's like a world of starcraft,starcraft and battalion wars combined. Only difference. Online is free.

Quote
Because for a futurist war game with alien races, plasma technology, huge ass space battleships, and so on, the game looks more cartoony than warcraft 3
As other people said it doesnt look cartoony. In fact I think starcraft 1 is more cartoony.

Quote
I hope to god we have some type of plasma shield dome we can build over our bases.
Star Warz Much?

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 27 2007, 10:10 pm by JordanN. Reason: img tag showing



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: RIVE