Yeah well obviously they were in it for the profit in the first place, they wouldn't want to change that now would they.

There's a difference in being for profit and being driven by profit.

Sorta like Firefox. They went from Open Source to a foundation of a Company.

Same with Azeurus.

I was at blizzcon a week ago.

One person asked the developers, "Are you doing anything to battle.net, making it subscribtion based?"
They replied, "No, it will be free to use." or something like that. but they were very clear: one will NOT have to pay a single penny to use battle.net

Not yet anyways...

we should all just work at blizzard, help with the production, and use our employee discount... *laughter*

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 23 2008, 8:49 pm by alayou.

We should learn how to use proper grammar, and realize that being an employee does not mean mass discounts.

nice comma splice i know there is no mass discount.

I think you people should realize that the original Starcraft was a two game piece, and people probably bitched about "having to upgrade" to get Brood War's story and units.

Come on!

My budget is seventy dollars. No More... Max is seventy dollars and Blizzard better find a way to fit everything withing seventy dollars something like:

Game itself (w/ Terran Campaign): 40 Dollars
Zerg and Protoss Campaigns: 30 Dollars.

I'd be extremely sad if I had to pay more money because I'm a big fan of the StarCraft Storyline. One thing's certain: THIS IS NOT ROCK BAND. I don't think they can justify charging approx 100 Dollars for just a single game even if it is a huge campaign, after all, RPGs have a huge storyline and much work done yet they charge no more than 50/60 dollars.