Staredit Network > Forums > SC2 Assistance > Topic: Events, Behaviours, Effects
Events, Behaviours, Effects
Aug 13 2010, 1:20 am
By: payne  

Aug 13 2010, 1:20 am payne Post #1

:payne:

I feel very noob about asking this, but many times I wanted to modify something from an ability and I always ended up randomly checking through the Events, Behaviours and Effects of it, never knowing which one I should look at.
So ya... can anyone gives a definition or differentiations of those 3 things?

EDIT: As Pears mentioned, it'd very appreciated to understand when to check all the boxes and when not to check them when we copy some unit/model/actor/etc. It's very confusing. :(

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 13 2010, 1:35 am by payne.



None.

Aug 13 2010, 1:31 am PearS Post #2



this would help me out a lot too. In the help vidoes people are always saying lets copy this or change this and i watch them without a solid knowledge of exactly what kinds of things are in each category. As i understand it effects fall into behaviors and the behavior is attached to the unit to get the desired effect?



None.

Aug 13 2010, 2:10 am Temp Post #3



I'll try my best to explain what I know.

Effect cause things to be effected. They either modify things in the world (e.g. damage, apply behaviour) or cause other effects (e.g. set, search).
Abilities are actions, they are things that are activated by players/triggers. Most of the time these will cause effects.
Behaviours are a lot like abilities but they require no action by players/triggers. The most common behaviour is buff all other behaviours are very specific (e.g. wander, click response).

Any visual/audio things you see are caused by actors that are attached to effects/abilities (and other things). These can be attached in a couple different ways. One is through events, for instance sound actors can be attached to effects through the events on the actor (effect.effectname.initial or something similar) so that when the effect happens a sound is played. The other way of being attached to another object is through a setting, like with units (unit name setting at the top of the actor's setting list).

In terms of duplicating never duplicate something you don't want to change. When you do duplicate something pay careful attention to actor events, it won't always duplicate things like sound actors and so you will need to manually attach them. For instance duplicating the permanently cloaked behaviour without duplicating the sound actors will cause no sound actors to be attached to it. Really, although inconvenient, I think this would be desired as you should modify the sound actor to also be attached to your cloak object (since the object would be no different).



None.

Aug 13 2010, 10:58 pm payne Post #4

:payne:

I'd like to add "Flags" to the list too. :)



None.

Aug 13 2010, 11:09 pm Temp Post #5



Flags are boolean attributes. Flags in the data editor have many different types of options, but in general they are used for preset things that can only be turned off and on.



None.

Aug 13 2010, 11:23 pm shmeeps Post #6



Yeah, many abilities need flags set for the unit/target. Say for instance, a Phoenix's attack is only allowed to attack units that are flagged as "Air Units". If you take a ground unit and change it's air unit flag to on, theoretically, a Phoenix would be able to target it without using it's void prison ability.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[12:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- "often was always pretty cool" 60% of the time, it works every time :shifty:
[11:26 pm]
NudeRaider -- The visuals are good, the animation is terrible: the movement is off, the impacts in battle scenes have zero weight to it, the lip sync is right up uncanny valley. But yeah, considering what it is it's pretty good overall.
[06:24 pm]
Oh_Man -- https://youtu.be/pPZafFJOi48 crazy good
[09:51 am]
NimoStar -- And Pathfinding in SC1 was not *that* bad, the problem is that it was designed as a flat 2D game like WC1 (and it was in the alpha) and then switched to isometric without changing the base code. So its actually a flat game pretending to be isometric. With the custom competitive maps that use larger ramps and elevation, pathfinding is quite fixed.
[09:47 am]
NimoStar -- The unlocking and map choice was fine, but mostly in WoL - In HoTS the worst of all units are irrelevant because Kerrigan has infinite summon and stuff. And even in WoL the spaceship instakill map powers are better than units. If I could RTS in my RTS that'd be great.
[2026-3-05. : 8:45 pm]
NudeRaider -- Nekron
Nekron shouted: NudeRaider not that the og sc1 campaigns are particularly good mechanically but cmon, SC2 map mechanics are the opposite of fun
There's many parts to it. I think the raw rts gameplay of sc1 is unsurpassed to this day. And I too never liked that sc2 missions always rush you in some way or another, because I like to take my time. However I still have to admit that they way they did it often was always pretty cool. Like lava rising and receding, a huge-ass mothership destroying bases, undead coming at night, just to name a few, those are definitely creative, so I'm sure there's people that liked it. But that's not even what I meant. It's the unlocking of new features and upgrades and choice which map to play next that made it so much more motivating for me.
[2026-3-05. : 6:49 pm]
Nekron -- like the train maps, enemies just kind of come at you (I'm not sure if there is a real enemy base, there might be one just on a technicality - you are to never interact with its production) and then you gotta chase trains for lulz
[2026-3-05. : 6:48 pm]
Nekron -- and even in WoL imo everything ends up feeling like you're just getting a lot of hidden timers that kind of force you into awkward resource management between main objective and defending your base against enemies from beyond this world
[2026-3-05. : 6:47 pm]
Nekron -- some ideas were okay in WoL but the further you go the worse it gets
[2026-3-05. : 6:46 pm]
Nekron -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: also the sc2 campaign mechanics were way more fun and involving
not that the og sc1 campaigns are particularly good mechanically but cmon, SC2 map mechanics are the opposite of fun
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Excalibur