|
Members in Shoutbox
None.
Shoutbox Search
Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper /me > Marks as action Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
|
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
[2017-7-05. : 8:35 pm]  Voyager7456 -- Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: but do you believe someone's livelihood should be threatened or even taken away because of their opinions? Yeah, I'm OK with it. There are lots of businesses I don't partake in because of their opinions.[2017-7-05. : 8:35 pm]  Pr0nogo -- because plenty of people think that you should lose your job, your freedom, your life, etc if you simply disagree with them[2017-7-05. : 8:34 pm]  Moose -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: Pr0nogo You can proclaim your racist opinions all you want, just don't be surprised when people stop coming over Well, other racists might still come over X^D[2017-7-05. : 8:34 pm] Pr0nogo -- but do you believe someone's livelihood should be threatened or even taken away because of their opinions?[2017-7-05. : 8:34 pm] Voyager7456 -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Voyager7456 Then don't say ambiguous things like this Voyager7456 when they don't have special meaning. Wouldn't even be reading into it if it wasn't said ROFL Damned if you do, damned if you don't.[2017-7-05. : 8:34 pm] Voyager7456 -- In no way is your freedom of speech threatened by others' freedom of association[2017-7-05. : 8:34 pm] Voyager7456 -- Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: i'm not comfortable with racists but i'm less comfortable knowing that thoughts and opinions can be removed from the mainstream consciousness You can proclaim your racist opinions all you want, just don't be surprised when people stop coming over[2017-7-05. : 8:33 pm] Pr0nogo -- this isn't specific to this case, i don't know enough about it to provide a serious commentary on it, i'm just speaking broadly[2017-7-05. : 8:33 pm] Pr0nogo -- i'm not comfortable with racists but i'm less comfortable knowing that thoughts and opinions can be removed from the mainstream consciousness[2017-7-05. : 8:32 pm] Moose -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: I think it's BS to twist leniency into a threat Then don't say ambiguous things like this Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: "We may publish updates to this story if events change" AKA every news story ever when they don't have special meaning. Wouldn't even be reading into it if it wasn't said ROFL[2017-7-05. : 8:32 pm] Voyager7456 -- Please refer to Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: NudeRaider It never applied. "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech" Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: TBH, freedom of a speech a thing errybody want to get mad AF about, but nobody want to RTFM about it LMAO [2017-7-05. : 8:31 pm] Pr0nogo -- the second you start censoring """problematic""" opinions and thoughts is the second you start regressing back to stalingrad m8[2017-7-05. : 8:30 pm] Moose -- Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: america was a mistake Would've crushed that revolution in the bud if they had the internet to trace people shitposting about it LMAO[2017-7-05. : 8:30 pm] Voyager7456 -- Pr0nogoPr0nogo shouted: >in hot water for memes Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: NudeRaider Also it wasn't the .gif he was apologizing for, the dude had a long history of horrible Reddit comments calling for genocide, using racial slurs and other bigoted crap [2017-7-05. : 8:27 pm] Moose -- It's easier to be okay with them having that power when the guy is a total shitbag, but that may not always be the case.[2017-7-05. : 8:27 pm] Moose -- I'm not saying anything about his opinions, I'm just saying that power makes me uncomfortable.[2017-7-05. : 8:25 pm] Voyager7456 -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Voyager7456 We have altered the procedure. Pray we do not alter it further. What, further in his favor? lmao[2017-7-05. : 8:24 pm] Moose -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: It's saying "hey, we did you a favor by keeping your identity secret, but that's not normal procedure" We have altered the procedure. Pray we do not alter it further.[2017-7-05. : 8:24 pm] Moose -- I get if he goes out and stabs somebody or whatever that'll be reported but I would have assumed that anyway.[2017-7-05. : 8:22 pm] Voyager7456 -- It's saying "hey, we did you a favor by keeping your identity secret, but that's not normal procedure"[2017-7-05. : 8:20 pm] Voyager7456 -- Important to outline it's anonymity for this story and not blanket immunity from any future reporting IMO[2017-7-05. : 8:19 pm] Voyager7456 -- Because if the next day this dude goes and does something newsworthy he'd be all up and crying "BUT YOU SAID YOU WOULDN'T REVEAL MY IDENTITY"[2017-7-05. : 8:14 pm] Voyager7456 -- "We may publish updates to this story if events change" AKA every news story ever[2017-7-05. : 8:11 pm] Moose -- I mean, you could make a case for blackmail maybe but not a First Amendment violation LMAO[2017-7-05. : 8:09 pm] Ashamed -- Mini Moose 2707Mini Moose 2707 shouted: TBH, freedom of a speech a thing errybody want to get mad AF about, but nobody want to RTFM about it LMAO I agree ha ><... I love reading stories about some corporation banning someone or something and people yell what about freedom of speech ha.[2017-7-05. : 8:09 pm] Moose -- TBH, freedom of a speech a thing errybody want to get mad AF about, but nobody want to RTFM about it LMAO[2017-7-05. : 8:04 pm] Moose -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: Mini Moose 2707 Am I getting this right? The guy was forced to apologize for editing a gif in a way that it looks like Trump wrestles CNN? What happened to free speech? It never applied. "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech"[2017-7-05. : 7:55 pm] poiuy_qwert -- Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: Oh, and preemptively: Voyager7456 Voyager7456 Voyager7456 Voyager7456 mad mad[2017-7-05. : 7:55 pm] Voyager7456 -- Oh, and preemptively: Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: I don't think they overstepped their boundaries at all. It's not CNN's fault he's a little bitch that feels threatened. Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: "I fear for my safety" cries man who posted about how happy he'd be to see George Soros' "bloated corpse dragged through the streets" Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: Reporters get death threats all the time from guys like this and his buddies - my sympathy level is fucking rock bottom Voyager7456Voyager7456 shouted: TBH, I'd have a lot more respect for CNN if they switched their programming over to exposing these pricks 24/7 mad[2017-7-05. : 7:55 pm] Voyager7456 -- TBH, I'd have a lot more respect for CNN if they switched their programming over to exposing these pricks 24/7[2017-7-05. : 7:54 pm] Voyager7456 -- Reporters get death threats all the time from guys like this and his buddies - my sympathy level is fucking rock bottom[2017-7-05. : 7:53 pm] Voyager7456 -- "I fear for my safety" cries man who posted about how happy he'd be to see George Soros' "bloated corpse dragged through the streets"[2017-7-05. : 7:52 pm] Voyager7456 -- I don't think they overstepped their boundaries at all. It's not CNN's fault he's a little bitch that feels threatened.[2017-7-05. : 7:51 pm] Voyager7456 -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: they may find them out and have an interview about it, but when they approach him in a manner that makes him feel threatened, they definitely overstepped their boundaries. NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: (they could offer to interview him anonymously) They did grant him anonymity.[2017-7-05. : 7:49 pm] Voyager7456 -- NudeRaiderNudeRaider shouted: jjf28 the problem is he did things he shouldn't have gotten away with. So you feel he should be exposed for that. But we both know media could care less about some internet racist. They got to him because of his political joke. And it's definitely not their job to expose people who have certain political views (widening the term 'releasing memes about politicians here') to the public if they prefer to remain anonymous. They got to him because the POTUS tweeted his post. Like it or not, anything the POTUS does is news.[2017-7-05. : 7:33 pm] NudeRaider -- they may find them out and have an interview about it, but when they approach him in a manner that makes him feel threatened, they definitely overstepped their boundaries.[2017-7-05. : 7:32 pm] NudeRaider -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: it's the medias job to expose people that are doing things they feel is wrong, not gonna fault them for that; though our biggest news companies (CNN->Time Warner) definitely should not be owned by companies invested all over the place s.t. their power could be abused the problem is he did things he shouldn't have gotten away with. So you feel he should be exposed for that. But we both know media could care less about some internet racist. They got to him because of his political joke. And it's definitely not their job to expose people who have certain political views (widening the term 'releasing memes about politicians here') to the public if they prefer to remain anonymous.[2017-7-05. : 7:10 pm] Ashamed -- bought me a new 2017 gli.. My first new car and worse investment ever![2017-7-05. : 5:39 pm] jjf28 -- it's the medias job to expose people that are doing things they feel is wrong, not gonna fault them for that; though our biggest news companies (CNN->Time Warner) definitely should not be owned by companies invested all over the place s.t. their power could be abused[2017-7-05. : 5:18 pm] Oh_Man -- pigy__Gpigy__G shouted: what's the name of lethal's defiler map again? wanted to show a friend how the hell did that even work? EUDs?[2017-7-05. : 5:13 pm] Voyager7456 -- TBH my only problem with this whole thing is they didn't blast his name and picture as a front page story. He'll learn nothing if he gets the chance to slink back into anonymity.[2017-7-05. : 5:13 pm] NudeRaider -- jjf28jjf28 shouted: NudeRaider ok I see the threatening undertones upon re-reading NudeRaider was a private institution not gov't ah my bad. I understood that the wrong way at first. Makes sense that reporters are doing what they do: investigate. But I'm still not sure how I feel about it. It's a powerful organization and one that forms public opinion. Not sure if they should be allowed to expose people that submit content under an alias. Tho I guess no law against that exists. But maybe it should.[2017-7-05. : 5:11 pm] Voyager7456 -- No rights were violated, it's not like they trespassed on private property or broke into email accounts or something. The idiot posted identifying information on a public forum. |