Members in Shoutbox
None.

Shoutbox Search
Search for:


Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper
/me > Marks as action

Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
Pages: < 1 « 3319 3320 3321 3322 33233570 >

[2014-10-12. : 6:19 pm]
Devourer -- :3
[2014-10-12. : 6:17 pm]
jjf28 -- test successful
[2014-10-12. : 6:17 pm]
jjf28 -- test
[2014-10-12. : 6:17 pm]
Devourer -- Good
[2014-10-12. : 6:15 pm]
jjf28 -- nope, no duplicates
[2014-10-12. : 6:15 pm]
Devourer -- :lol:
[2014-10-12. : 6:15 pm]
jjf28 -- are you hitting on me?
[2014-10-12. : 6:15 pm]
Devourer -- Duplicated entries are gone; can reproduce, jjf?
[2014-10-12. : 6:03 pm]
Devourer -- Oh yeah :) Laying in bed, playing some music for 2-3 hours while falling asleep <.< this is gonna be it
[2014-10-12. : 6:03 pm]
Devourer -- Problems probably will be gone in the next 14 minutes.
[2014-10-12. : 6:03 pm]
jjf28 -- get some sleep dev :P
[2014-10-12. : 6:02 pm]
Devourer -- What am I doing? Haha. Staying up till 4AM last night and enforcing an early wake-up wasn't the best decision.
[2014-10-12. : 6:02 pm]
jjf28 -- till 15 mins
[2014-10-12. : 6:01 pm]
jjf28 -- i'm all tapped out though, would have to work to get a new IP now
[2014-10-12. : 6:01 pm]
jjf28 -- looks like you did it :P
[2014-10-12. : 6:01 pm]
Devourer -- wait don't
[2014-10-12. : 6:01 pm]
Devourer -- Try again?
[2014-10-12. : 6:00 pm]
Devourer -- Haha ok; I forced to at most update 1 entry but creating new ones is still possible; whooops. Sorry.
[2014-10-12. : 5:59 pm]
jjf28 -- i dunno, just added more duplicates to the shoutbox
[2014-10-12. : 5:58 pm]
Devourer -- [[the duplicated ones, that is]]
[2014-10-12. : 5:58 pm]
Devourer -- Worked. Your entries should disappear in <= 15 minutes
[2014-10-12. : 5:58 pm]
jjf28 -- shouted
[2014-10-12. : 5:58 pm]
Devourer -- Please shout something after this shout here.
[2014-10-12. : 5:56 pm]
jjf28 -- hmm?
[2014-10-12. : 5:53 pm]
Devourer -- jjf?
[2014-10-12. : 5:51 pm]
jjf28 -- :O someone could track when i'm moving; i'm sueing!
[2014-10-12. : 5:46 pm]
jjf28 -- lol i switched from comp to phone and prolly through a wifi zone
[2014-10-12. : 5:45 pm]
Devourer -- give me some minutes.
[2014-10-12. : 5:45 pm]
Devourer -- Lol'd
[2014-10-12. : 5:44 pm]
Dem0n -- ban him for multiple accounts pls
[2014-10-12. : 5:43 pm]
Roy -- Okay, seriously, jjf?
[2014-10-12. : 5:20 pm]
jjf28 -- or failed to initialize it
[2014-10-12. : 5:18 pm]
jjf28 -- can also help with debugging (seeing that X is 0 or 255 rather than what you had it as can make it click that you already freed it)
[2014-10-12. : 5:17 pm]
jjf28 -- it would be inefficient for all but security nuts, i don't know whether OSs do it but it's a decision compilers/OSs have to make
[2014-10-12. : 5:15 pm]
Roy -- It'd be inefficient; do you know any operating systems that behave that way? Is it for security reasons or something?
[2014-10-12. : 5:14 pm]
jjf28 -- that's up to the OS
[2014-10-12. : 5:13 pm]
Roy -- It's not like freeing memory fills it with writes of 0.
[2014-10-12. : 5:12 pm]
Roy -- The memory could have any form of data in it when you allocate it, which is why most languages require you initialize a variable before actually using it.
[2014-10-12. : 5:09 pm]
Roy -- If that memory is in use by something else, your program isn't going to allocate it.
[2014-10-12. : 5:08 pm]
Roy -- You're asking if memory you write to will write to memory. The answer is yes.
[2014-10-12. : 4:49 pm]
Dem0n -- Jack
Jack shouted: http://pastebin.com/uLYZzjKQ dem0n, try this
Oh, what I meant to ask was that if you free the memory, then dynamically allocate that same memory, does whatever was previously there just get overwritten by the new stuff?
[2014-10-12. : 4:33 pm]
Echo -- Cool dood
[2014-10-12. : 4:23 pm]
jjf28 -- http://youtu.be/UmTczaVvfJc
[2014-10-12. : 3:56 pm]
Dem0n -- jeez moose nice job repeating what was already in the op. lrn2read
[2014-10-12. : 1:22 pm]
Azrael -- Roy
Roy shouted: Put it just below "Green Zerg" in the list of priorities. :roy:
Devourer
Devourer shouted: Can't :lol:
Fuck everybody xD
[2014-10-12. : 12:05 pm]
Arkane -- http://picosong.com/fy3P/ o3o
[2014-10-12. : 6:57 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I don't think I can do it at work ... :\ that's too bad
[2014-10-12. : 6:56 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Maybe now that the wiki is fixed I can make sure the wiki one is up-to-date
[2014-10-12. : 6:36 am]
Jack -- <3
[2014-10-12. : 6:27 am]
jjf28 -- there's a few more up-to-date edits
[2014-10-12. : 6:19 am]
poiuy_qwert -- thanks jjf28, but thats the same .chk spec :(
[2014-10-12. : 6:16 am]
LoveLess -- You cannot escape me Jack.
[2014-10-12. : 5:36 am]
jjf28 -- also the trig documentation needs... more detail https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AhsBSmgfjeb6dEpwX0g3RngxZkJUX3F5VkpJTS1uaFE&gid=0
[2014-10-12. : 5:33 am]
jjf28 -- poiuy_qwert
poiuy_qwert shouted: hey FaRTy, do you know if there is a better .chk spec than http://www.staredit.net/wiki/35/ ?
http://www.staredit.net/starcraft/Scenario.chk
[2014-10-12. : 5:20 am]
Jack -- first time it crashed for me, second and third times it didn't crash.
[2014-10-12. : 5:20 am]
Jack -- http://pastebin.com/uLYZzjKQ dem0n, try this
[2014-10-12. : 5:18 am]
poiuy_qwert -- hey FaRTy, do you know if there is a better .chk spec than http://www.staredit.net/wiki/35/ ?
[2014-10-12. : 5:16 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- except in that case it wouldn't work for 100 tests, but on the 101st it would :awesome:
[2014-10-12. : 5:15 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- ya, that was the problem sfmpqapi in TinyMap had
[2014-10-12. : 5:12 am]
Jack -- That's why messing up pointers can sometimes not be apparent after, say, 100 tests, but on the 101'th test it fails.
[2014-10-12. : 5:12 am]
Jack -- It won't always terminate the program or terminate it, as far as I know.
[2014-10-12. : 4:59 am]
jjf28 -- orite C doesn't really do exceptions; guess you could still write exceptions from OS APIs/with inline assembly mimicking exceptions if you really cared too tho :P
[2014-10-12. : 4:51 am]
jjf28 -- it's not behavior standardized in C
[2014-10-12. : 4:51 am]
jjf28 -- your operating system may or may not: prevent it/raise an exception/terminate your program
[2014-10-12. : 4:49 am]
Dem0n -- When you try to put something at that address after you've freed it, does it just overwrite what was previously there?
[2014-10-12. : 4:47 am]
jjf28 -- so how dangerous would it be to fall asleep with a mouth full of water...
[2014-10-12. : 4:41 am]
jjf28 -- so don't actually do it :kame:
[2014-10-12. : 4:40 am]
jjf28 -- yes, but it may not be what it was, and it may raise an exception depending on your system and its current state
[2014-10-12. : 4:27 am]
Dem0n -- Can you still acess something that's been placed at a specific memory address even after the memory has been freed in C?

Pages: < 1 « 3319 3320 3321 3322 33233570 >


Members Online: liamscott63