Staredit Network

Staredit Network > Profile-Scene > Voyager7456 > basic

Profile for Voyager7456

Basic

Contributions

Activity-Logs

Administration

Send me a Message
Find my Posts
Find my Topics
Send me Minerals

Oh_Man, anoeth47,

Ultraviolet,

Moose, dydwk474

Account Information
Joined:	Aug 28 2007, 1:14 pm
Last Active:	Aug 20 2025, 2:58 am
Status:	Offline
Display Name:	Voyager7456

Responsible for my own happiness? I can't even be responsible for my own breakfast

Statistics
Activity:	3305
Posts:	1397
Posts Per Day:	0.2
Topics:	35
Minerals:	23

Contact Information
E-Mail:	Lewl coming soon // No spambots

Battle.net
Starcraft I:	Not Given.
Starcraft II:	Not Given.

Global Shoutbox

[09:16 am]

NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/

[02:29 am]

Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself

[01:46 am]

Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me

[06:02 pm]

Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"

[05:48 pm]

Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs

[05:47 pm]

Zoan -- Heinermann

Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased

Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative

[05:44 pm]

NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?

[05:43 pm]

Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased

[05:39 pm]

NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal

[05:32 pm]

Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

RIVE