Site Forums Starcraft I Files Starcraft II Files Wiki
Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Minerals
Minerals
Nov 30 2009, 7:19 pm
By: Jack
Pages: < 1 « 3 4 5
 
Polls
Should minerals and the store be brought back?
Should minerals and the store be brought back?
Answer Votes Percentage % Voters
Yes. 35
 
77%
None.
No. 6
 
14%
None.
No, and remove name colours, shoutbox colours, and other item-induced effects from those who have them. 5
 
11%
None.
Please login to vote.
Poll has 46 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

Mar 3 2010, 6:16 am payne Post #81

:payne:

Quote from Devourer
Quote from Devourer
Well, nevermind, for now IP doesn't want me to implement them, so well I guess they are lost forever or IP may change his mind. I do not want you to bother IP for that.
... payne payne payne... ;) should lurk a bit more.
You still love me? :wub: :awesome:
:>
But anyways, IP doesn't do a single shit around here, why should his opinion over-pass the community's ?
And if you say it's because he is paying the server, I know there is a member that wanted to pay for it... so this argument isn't valid to my eyes. ;o



None.

Mar 3 2010, 6:19 am Devourer Post #82

Hello

Quote from payne
Quote from Devourer
Quote from Devourer
Well, nevermind, for now IP doesn't want me to implement them, so well I guess they are lost forever or IP may change his mind. I do not want you to bother IP for that.
... payne payne payne... ;) should lurk a bit more.
You still love me? :wub: :awesome:
:>
But anyways, IP doesn't do a single shit around here, why should his opinion over-pass the community's ?
And if you say it's because he is paying the server, I know there is a member that wanted to pay for it... so this argument isn't valid to my eyes. ;o
it doesn't matter at all: IP has coded it anyways. Sure, some of you may think "Hey Dev, take the codes and lets move to an other server", but this is asocial and I will never do so without permission. And it's not like IP isn't interested in SEN, it's more like he is too busy.

I'm a slave, not an admin, haha.



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Mar 3 2010, 6:20 am DevliN Post #83

Woah

The topic in the Staff forum died when IP said he didn't want to do it.



:devlin: Currently Working On: :devlin:
Myself

Options
Pages: < 1 « 3 4 5
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
Global Shoutbox
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
 Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.
©2003-2026 Staredit Network.
Starcraft & Starcraft II are trademarks of Blizzard Entertainment.
Site Index | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Contributions


Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Dem0n, RIVE