Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: C++ GetTickCount
C++ GetTickCount
Jul 20 2009, 2:12 pm
By: FatalException  

Jul 20 2009, 2:12 pm FatalException Post #1



In C++, is there a way to check individual digits in the tick count? I want to use the tick count to generate semi-random simple arithmetic problems with the following form: x (+, -, *) y = z. I would use tenths of seconds (hundreds of ticks) to determine x, hundredths of seconds (tens of ticks) to determine the operation, and milliseconds to determine y. The user inputs z.

If not, is there another way to do this?



None.

Jul 20 2009, 4:09 pm Heinermann Post #2

memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes memes

int count = GetTickCount();
int x = count \ 100;
int op = count \ 10;
int y = count;

But you want the single digits(in decimal) in those placess, right?

int count = GetTickCount();
int x = (count \ 100) % 1000;
int op = (count \ 10) % 100;
int y = count % 10;




Jul 20 2009, 8:05 pm FatalException Post #3



Well, the problem with that way is that (correct me if I'm wrong), GetTickCount tracks the number of milliseconds since the CPU was turned on, so just dividing the tick count can give huge results that I don't really want if I've left my computer on. I could just check each number to see if it's greater than 10, 100, 1000, etc. and divide accordingly, but I'd rather not do that if there's a simpler way.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations
[10:12 pm]
Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Symmetry, O)FaRTy1billion[MM]