Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Google's Chrome OS
Google's Chrome OS
Jul 8 2009, 9:18 pm
By: ~:Deathawk:~  

Jul 8 2009, 9:18 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #1



Article:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/168080/faq_google_chrome_os.html

I love Google, but I'm not too confident it's going to make too big of a splash in the OS market. Personally, I don't like the idea of a web-centric operating system. The idea seems crippling, although for the basic tasks that Google intends to provide services for (Google Docs, Calandar, Email, etc.) I suppose it'll be fine. But there lies the problem, the operating system is going to be another one of those Linux distros that are geared toward doing simple things, and until it becomes a suitable desktop operating system as opposed to an operating system geared towards the netbook market, it's not going to be taking any significant marketshare.

What are your thoughts? And on a secondary note, GMail and a handful of other Google web apps are officially out of beta. Hooray ! ;)



None.

Jul 8 2009, 9:21 pm Falkoner Post #2



Quote
another one of those Linux distros that are geared toward doing simple things

In the GUI, perhaps, but not under the hood(Terminal), at least when it comes to Linux.

I think that this Google OS is going to be exactly the kind of OS that most people actually need, one that can do basic office functions, lots of computer power is wasted for people who have an OS that is much more capable than their needs.



None.

Jul 8 2009, 9:28 pm ToA Post #3

Que Sera, Sera.

we all knew an os would come about.




Jul 8 2009, 9:35 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #4



Quote from Falkoner
In the GUI, perhaps, but not under the hood(Terminal), at least when it comes to Linux.]

But there are already a handful of Linux distros that offer a simple, user friendly GUI and are geared toward netbook use. I can't imagine the idea of being web centric drawing people towards Linux, since the handful of linux distros that are packaged with retail netbooks haven't been too successful.



None.

Jul 8 2009, 9:36 pm Falkoner Post #5



Quote
But there are already a handful of Linux distros that offer a simple, user friendly GUI and are geared toward netbook use. I can't imagine the idea of being web centric drawing people towards Linux, since the handful of linux distros that are packaged with retail netbooks haven't been too successful.

I think the main draw of it is the Google support, since Google has the power behind their servers to also help out.



None.

Jul 14 2009, 10:03 am Syphon Post #6



Quote from ~:Deathawk:~
Quote from Falkoner
In the GUI, perhaps, but not under the hood(Terminal), at least when it comes to Linux.]

But there are already a handful of Linux distros that offer a simple, user friendly GUI and are geared toward netbook use. I can't imagine the idea of being web centric drawing people towards Linux, since the handful of linux distros that are packaged with retail netbooks haven't been too successful.

But Google's is going to be /better/.

I rpedict within 2 years of this out, it will be on all netbooks by default, and Microsoft will be clamoring with a version of Windows solely for netbooks.



None.

Jul 14 2009, 10:24 am Ahli Post #7

I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.

Google will take over earth someday :P

But I sense that they will have some problems at launch because they have no experience in creating an OS. But a few months after release that OS will rock. I'm sure...




Jul 14 2009, 10:45 am InsolubleFluff Post #8



I'd want a Google OS for laptop and webbooks, but a PC needs windows, just the way it has to be.

I forsee an above expectation OS.



None.

Jul 14 2009, 3:41 pm Vi3t-X Post #9



So everything is going to be web based?



None.

Jul 15 2009, 5:31 pm Jello-Jigglers Post #10



Quote from Ahli
Google will take over earth someday :P

But I sense that they will have some problems at launch because they have no experience in creating an OS. But a few months after release that OS will rock. I'm sure...
Google for president :)

This is going to make a dent in the OS market. Google developers already use the google OS as their main setup because it's the best[source needed]. Anything google makes will succeed, even if it takes them a couple tries, mark my words.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jul 15 2009, 7:12 pm by Jello-Jigglers.



None.

Jul 15 2009, 5:46 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #11



Quote from Jello-Jigglers
Google for president :)

This is going to make a dent in the OS market. Google developers already use the google OS as their main setup because it's the best. Anything google makes will succeed, even if it takes them a couple tries, mark my words.

Umm, what? Where did you hear anything like that? I appreciate the enthusiasm and support you have for Google but you shouldn't be spreading junk like that.



None.

Jul 15 2009, 6:55 pm Jello-Jigglers Post #12



Hear what? That google devs use chrome os?

EDIT:
Hmm, i cant find the source, but I seem to remember reading it on engadget somewhere. I'll note that in my previous post.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jul 15 2009, 7:12 pm by Jello-Jigglers.



None.

Jul 15 2009, 7:39 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #13



That the Google developers use "Google OS" on their "main setup". Google's operating system is still a work in progress and the most info we have on its development is a couple sets of alleged photos which are likely fake anyway.



None.

Jul 16 2009, 1:48 am Jello-Jigglers Post #14



Page has done multiple interviews on the matter, so, we do have more than faked photos. Your post is incorrect.



None.

Jul 16 2009, 4:18 pm ClansAreForGays Post #15



Quote from Jello-Jigglers
Page has done multiple interviews on the matter, so, we do have more than faked photos. Your post is incorrect.
You really need to source.




Jul 16 2009, 4:31 pm Jello-Jigglers Post #16



CAFG, you can google as well as i can.

Heres the latest source:
Larry Page and Mr. Schmidt Interview About Google CHROME OS
(july 9, 2009)



None.

Jul 16 2009, 5:09 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #17



Quote from Jello-Jigglers
CAFG, you can google as well as i can.

Heres the latest source:
Larry Page and Mr. Schmidt Interview About Google CHROME OS
(july 9, 2009)
That doesn't say anything about the developers and it doesn't really prove anything besides that Google has a concept. We don't know how far they've gotten along with the operating system and if it's level of functionality at the moment. I don't know what you were trying to support with that site there... Nobody's arguing the fact that Google has an operating system in the works...



None.

Jul 16 2009, 8:55 pm Jello-Jigglers Post #18



Quote from ~:Deathawk:~
Quote from Jello-Jigglers
CAFG, you can google as well as i can.

Heres the latest source:
Larry Page and Mr. Schmidt Interview About Google CHROME OS
(july 9, 2009)
That doesn't say anything about the developers and it doesn't really prove anything besides that Google has a concept. We don't know how far they've gotten along with the operating system and if it's level of functionality at the moment. I don't know what you were trying to support with that site there... Nobody's arguing the fact that Google has an operating system in the works...
You said the only info on the OS were faked pictures. This is more info.



None.

Jul 17 2009, 2:22 am ~:Deathawk:~ Post #19



About the concept, there is. We don't actually have any solid info on the OS and what stage it's on, etc.



None.

Jul 17 2009, 3:54 am Jello-Jigglers Post #20



Exactly.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations
[10:12 pm]
Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Symmetry, O)FaRTy1billion[MM]