Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: How many hours do you spend on internet?
How many hours do you spend on internet?
May 6 2009, 1:22 am
By: Phobos
Pages: < 1 2 3
 
Polls
How many?
How many?
Answer Votes Percentage % Voters
Less than 1-1 1
 
3%
None.
2-4 15
 
32%
None.
5-7 13
 
28%
None.
8-10 1
 
3%
None.
11-13 6
 
13%
None.
14-16 4
 
9%
None.
17-19 0
 
0%
None.
20-22 0
 
0%
None.
23-24 1
 
3%
None.
+24 Hours 7
 
15%
None.
Please login to vote.
Poll has 48 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

May 8 2009, 2:41 pm NudeRaider Post #41

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Quote from name:Richard Nixons Head
No one, as there are not even 24 hours in a day, but rather 23 hours and 56 minutes.
... if your point of reference is the whole universe => stellar day.
But who cares about the few sunrays that come to us from other stars and galaxies?

What's important for us is the solar day which is 86,400 seconds by definition.
Funny thing about it is that seconds are becoming longer and longer over the centuries and milennia because of tidal forces slowing down earth's rotation.




May 8 2009, 6:23 pm Dapperdan Post #42



I'd say 2-4 pretty consistently. But some days I don't spend longer than 10 minutes... so there's a chance it averages out more in the 1-2 hour range.



None.

May 8 2009, 7:01 pm JaFF Post #43



Quote from Dapperdan
I'd say 2-4 pretty consistently. But some days I don't spend longer than 10 minutes... so there's a chance it averages out more in the 1-2 hour range.
So I've noticed.



None.

May 8 2009, 7:11 pm Moose Post #44

Armor: 90.50%

I spend both too much time and not enough time on the internet simultaneously.




May 8 2009, 9:14 pm EzDay281 Post #45



Quote
I spend both too much time and not enough time on the internet simultaneously.
The progression of days has frozen, preventing the waveform collapse of the numbers of hours you could have been spending today?
Quote
For all practical purposes it is 24.
"Being a smartass" isn't practical? D:



None.

Options
Pages: < 1 2 3
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Shishani, NimoStar