None.
Haha, I play DotA! I'm not great, about two months ago I was pretty competitive, but I haven't played since then so I assume my ability has since decreased a bit. I played a game last week or so and the whole new store setup threw me off. I haven't yet gotten a hold of the changes within the last two months. Let me know if you wanna play with me, I think my WC3 name is ChadDaddy but I could be terribly wrong. I generally won't log on unless I already have a game set up or others ask me, though, so if you wanna play with me, it'd be in your best interest to ask me.
I came back from an 18-month break while recovering from surgery. Having missed 18 or so version releases, I was needless to say somewhat confused at first 
Not too much has changed; just some new heroes and a few things were reworked, especially in 6.60. DotA is an awesome game though.
Not too much has changed; just some new heroes and a few things were reworked, especially in 6.60. DotA is an awesome game though.
None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal [04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)