Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: What do you think about this build?
What do you think about this build?
Oct 4 2007, 12:13 am
By: DarkDeserter  

Oct 6 2007, 8:36 pm Excalibur Post #21

The sword and the faith

I dont know whats wrong with Deathawk but Radeon is teh l0se. :-_-:




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Oct 6 2007, 11:51 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #22



no way! It's physically the same as an HD 2900 XT, except a lot cheaper. It overclocks very well, and all you need to do is flash it to an HD 2900 XT BIOS to add extra voltage to the core, making it an HD 2900 XT for 280~, basically.

but I have a feeling you wern't heing teh seri0us.



None.

Oct 12 2007, 11:16 pm Fisty Post #23



You make me jealous...I have worse like everything :( . My graphics card in comparison came out of my ass.



None.

Oct 13 2007, 8:59 pm Sael Post #24



8800 GTX still beats 2900 XT in like... everything.

*Edit* Except synthetic benchmarks like 3dMarks 06, which is actually misleading about real world performance comparatively to the 8800 GTX and GTS.



None.

Oct 13 2007, 11:02 pm Fisty Post #25



Whatever, my suggestion is stay one step behind cutting edge so you can play all new games but not have to pay so much for it.



None.

Oct 14 2007, 2:22 am ~:Deathawk:~ Post #26



I'm not recommending the HD 2900 pro/XT if you have the money for a GTX.

And I would hope the GTX beats a Pro/XT, considering the price difference.

I don't think flashing to XT even adds voltage, only changes to default clocks, since the Pro/XT volts are the same I think. The Pro has a better reference heatsink than the XT, too.



None.

Oct 14 2007, 5:20 am Sael Post #27



I'm looking forward to the product refresh supposedly coming in November. I suppose we'll just be seeing the 8800 GT replacing the 8800 GTS 320 Mb version and some lower end cards, but it's nice to imagine that the 9800 GTX would come out. On the other hand, I can rest more soundly knowing that my 8800 GTX is still going to be the fastest card around (I like to consider the Ultra merely a faster GTX).



None.

Oct 15 2007, 7:10 pm Kellimus Post #28



Vista sucks big testicles right now.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[05:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[05:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[05:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
[03:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- (and yes, I capitalized that correctly :ego:)
[03:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Hi not I'm dad
Hi dad, I'm nude
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Vrael, Nuralldin, Moose