Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: CPU/Motherboard compatability question
CPU/Motherboard compatability question
Feb 27 2009, 7:48 pm
By: sharf  

Feb 27 2009, 7:48 pm sharf Post #1



Ok, before I order the parts I want to make sure they're compatable. I have an AMD CPU, AM2+ socket, Phenom X4. My motherboard's sockets are AM2+/AM2, and supports Phenom/Athelon 64/ sempron

Will the processor work with the motherboard? My question is really; is Phenom X4 still Phenom? I think so since it's not Phenom II it should work right?



None.

Feb 28 2009, 6:37 am Lt.Church Post #2



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_AM2+ You could always check wikipedia or google am2+ compatability, but yes phenom X4 work in AM2+ slots but its important for your motherboard to support the processor, its like even if a key fits into a lock doesnt mean its the right key for said lock, you know?



None.

Mar 1 2009, 5:02 am rockz Post #3

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

AM2 uses HyperTransport 1.0
AM2+ uses HyperTransport 2.0
AM3 uses HyperTransport 3.0

All of them will fit together, and you can use any processor in any of them. The phenoms are all am2+, and most dual core athlons (brisbane/windsor) are am2. If you put an am2 processor in an am2+ motherboard, it will use HyperTransport 1.0. The same goes for am2+ processor in an am2 motherboard.

am3 will throw things for a loop, however, as I don't think you can use am3 processors in am2 sockets. The wikipedia article has more on this, and in any case, you don't really want to mix and match.

Finally, get the deneb. Much much better than the agena, with much lower temps and thus requires less power. Not to mention phenom 2 finally beats out the q6600 in price/performance.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Mar 1 2009, 9:47 am ShadowFlare Post #4



I think it was the other way around, that AM3 boards only support AM3 processors, but AM2/AM2+ boards support AM3 processors. So with AM3 the processors are backward compatible, but the motherboards are not.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations
[10:12 pm]
Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: DarkenedFantasies, Symmetry